Re: [Catalyst] User Generated Content (project collaboration)

2006-09-10 Thread Kaare Rasmussen
So, what do you all think? I saw several willing people. I don't have a lot of free time right now, but Id be willing to be a clearinghouse for interested people. The thread got divided a bit in discussions regarding the social network framework and the necessary widgets. The latter

[Catalyst] Hosting options, please recommend

2006-09-10 Thread Kieren Diment
It recently came up on IRC, and Dreamhost aside there seems to be a lack of information on who will host catalyst on FastCGI in a shared environment. Please can you use this thread to provide your recommendation/warning. Bear in mind that this is likely to become a page on the wiki if we get a

Re: [Catalyst] User Generated Content (project collaboration)

2006-09-10 Thread Kieren Diment
On 10/09/06, Kaare Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, what do you all think?I saw several willing people.I don't have a lot of free time right now, but Id be willing to be a clearinghouse for interested people.The thread got divided a bit in discussions regarding the social network framework

Re: [Catalyst] Hosting options, please recommend

2006-09-10 Thread Daniel McBrearty
get a virtual machine at bytemark.co.uk slightly more than el cheapo shared hosting but root access and do what the hell you like with it. good customer service too. On 9/10/06, Kieren Diment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It recently came up on IRC, and Dreamhost aside there seems to be a lack of

Re: [Catalyst] User Generated Content (project collaboration)

2006-09-10 Thread John Napiorkowski
I'll try to reply to both of you in one place to see if I can keep this from splitting up so much again. I'm personally interested in the idea of the social networking framework as well as the general wed widgets framework Matt mentioned. Also I am interested in the idea of creating an easy way

[Catalyst] Wrong content-length value (since 5.7001?)

2006-09-10 Thread Paul Makepeace
I've started receiving this error when re-POSTing multipart/form-data, in essence after an upload hitting 'reload' and confirm, [error] Caught exception in engine Wrong Content-Length value: 9013 at /Library/Perl/5.8.6/Catalyst.pm line 1565 I *think* this has appeared between 5.7000 and 5.7001

Re: [Catalyst] Spending time with Catalyst (slightly OT)

2006-09-10 Thread Matthieu Codron
Roman a écrit : Check jQuery. It's better than all of the other libraries combined. Reminds me of Catalyst ways as well. Its a framework, but it's not limiting, you can do whatever you want your own ways. And it's extendibles by plugins. Just released a stable version 1. Strong community

Re: [Catalyst] Bug in URI ?!

2006-09-10 Thread Paul Makepeace
[+catalyst] On 8/16/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dominic Mitchell wrote: David Dorward wrote: Paul Makepeace wrote: URI::_query::query_form() which makes query strings: $self-query(@query ? join('', @query) : undef); Now as anyone in web standards knows, that ought to

Re: [Catalyst] Bug in URI ?!

2006-09-10 Thread Ash Berlin
Paul Makepeace wrote: [+catalyst] On 8/16/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dominic Mitchell wrote: David Dorward wrote: Paul Makepeace wrote: URI::_query::query_form() which makes query strings: $self-query(@query ? join('', @query) : undef); Now as

Re: [Catalyst] Bug in URI ?!

2006-09-10 Thread Paul Makepeace
On 9/10/06, Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I missing something, or does $c-uri_for( $path, @args?, \%query_values? ) not do what you are asking for? Or is the problem that any ampersands in there don't get escaped? That's right, the ampersands are not escaped. Technically, that is

Re: [Catalyst] Spending time with Catalyst (slightly OT)

2006-09-10 Thread Kaare Rasmussen
Seeing this thread, I decided to start concentrating links to JS libraries in the CMS wikia: There's also - Google Web Toolkit: http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/ - Zimbra claims to offer an Ajax toolkit and support something called OpenAjax Alliance along with Oracle, IBM and other big

Re: [Catalyst] Wrong content-length value (since 5.7001?)

2006-09-10 Thread Adam Sjøgren
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:39:51 +0100, Paul wrote: I've started receiving this error when re-POSTing multipart/form-data, in essence after an upload hitting 'reload' and confirm, [error] Caught exception in engine Wrong Content-Length value: 9013 at /Library/Perl/5.8.6/Catalyst.pm line 1565 I

Re: [Catalyst] Spending time with Catalyst (slightly OT)

2006-09-10 Thread Roman
Matthieu Codron wrote: Roman a écrit : Check jQuery. It's better than all of the other libraries combined. Reminds me of Catalyst ways as well. Its a framework, but it's not limiting, you can do whatever you want your own ways. And it's extendibles by plugins. Just released a stable

Re: [Catalyst] Wrong content-length value (since 5.7001?)

2006-09-10 Thread Paul Makepeace
On 9/10/06, Adam Sjøgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:39:51 +0100, Paul wrote: I've started receiving this error when re-POSTing multipart/form-data, in essence after an upload hitting 'reload' and confirm, [error] Caught exception in engine Wrong Content-Length value:

Re: [Catalyst] Wrong content-length value (since 5.7001?)

2006-09-10 Thread Adam Sjøgren
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 22:20:50 +0100, Paul wrote: A guess: Your browser does not re-send the files you have chosen in file-type INPUT-elements when you do a reload+confirm instead of back+submit? Why would it not do that? I'm using Firefox 1.5. I don't know. Maybe it's a bug, maybe it's a

Re: [Catalyst] RESTful perl implementations...

2006-09-10 Thread John Napiorkowski
Arg, it is now. At least I tweaked it a bit from the last iteration. Seems to work but still lacks tests. -john --- Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Napiorkowski wrote: As I promised earlier, attached is No it isn't. -- Matt S Trout Offering custom