Experts: Why is Catalyst a qw/better more-robust more-enduring
better-Rails-Killer easier-to-use/ framework than Jifty or
(Woodstock|Mojo)?
Seeing these other frameworks mentioned online - just curious.
-- Hugh
I beg the indulgence of the list if this has all been discussed
already. I tried to search my archived list copies but didn't see
anything directly applicable, and since I multi-task as the DBA here in
the office I can't dedicate too much time to head scratching over
this
I recently had
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
OK, don't mean to sound like a whiner here, and I haven't spent any time
investigating the various GCC packages, but it's making me laugh that
it's been suggested I download a C++ development package just so I can
get my perl modules to install.
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
On 6/28/06, Hugh Lampert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem. Hate to impose on
the members of the list, but can anyone point me in the direction of a
good win32 binary GCC package that doesn't require Cygwin
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
On 6/26/06, Hugh Lampert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to let you know something amusing - I tried the preconfigured
CPAN.pm that comes with ActiveState Perl 5.8.8. First, it took about 10
minutes to figure out I needed to type Enter+Space instead
Matt S Trout wrote:
Once you've got CPAN configured and nmake and a gcc installed,
http://shadowcatsystems.co.uk/static/cat-install
will install Catalyst itself plus deps hands-off via CPAN (with a
little help from ppm on windows)
Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem. Hate
