Re: [Catalyst] user maintenance

2007-09-02 Thread Toby Corkindale
Adam Bartosik wrote: MySQL 4.x and 5.0 will accept the above SQL syntax, but will silently ignore it, and not actually perform any referential integrity checking, nor cascading. ie. It all looks like it's working fine, until it breaks horribly when you get into detailed testing. You have been

Re: [Catalyst] user maintenance

2007-08-31 Thread Toby Corkindale
Michael Higgins wrote: Hello, list -- I have a catalyst app about to get a bunch of new users. In anticipation of that, I'd like advice on how to maintain the user/acl tables I set up per the tutorial. Basically, I just want to add the user and have a default role automagically appear in

Re: [Catalyst] (en) error screen translations

2007-08-30 Thread Toby Corkindale
Jonathan Rockway wrote: Here's the list: (en) Please come back later (fr) SVP veuillez revenir plus tard (de) Bitte versuchen sie es spaeter nocheinmal (at) Konnten's bitt'schoen spaeter nochmal reinschauen (no) Vennligst prov igjen senere (dk) Venligst prov igen senere (pl) Prosze

Re: [Catalyst] A Perl Message Queue?

2007-08-25 Thread Toby Corkindale
Pedro Melo wrote: Hi, On Aug 25, 2007, at 4:07 AM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: Bernhard Graf wrote: Don't know about TheSchwartz (btw. what a stupid name) When you write your own message queue that actually works correctly, is supported and documented, and is available freely on the CPAN,

Re: [Catalyst] Gentoo portage overlay

2007-07-24 Thread Toby Corkindale
Matt S Trout wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:56:07AM +0200, Michele Beltrame wrote: Hello! I've been travelling for quite a while and am now on the other side of the world, but am back at work on Catalyst-based apps, and re-subbed to the list. Anyway, I just wondered who was maintaining

[Catalyst] Gentoo portage overlay

2007-07-20 Thread Toby Corkindale
Hi guys, I've been travelling for quite a while and am now on the other side of the world, but am back at work on Catalyst-based apps, and re-subbed to the list. Anyway, I just wondered who was maintaining the Gentoo portage Catalyst overlay, as I have a couple of ebuilds for them. -Toby #

Re: [Catalyst] Apache2+fcgid or Lighttpd

2007-03-19 Thread Toby Corkindale
Daniel McBrearty wrote: I thought of using fcgi also, but wondered if the fact that lighty doesn't make the fcgi connection persistent was significant. Are you sure? It looked persistent to me. On 3/15/07, Michele Beltrame [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm about to deploy an application, and this

Re: [Catalyst] Dreamhost for Catalyst

2007-03-09 Thread Toby Corkindale
, if you want to make sure you get all the same stuff I have, not sure if they are putting new customers on that box) Danny Toby Corkindale wrote: Danny Warren wrote: Here is the part where you get flooded with host recommendations from everyone! I use these guys: http://asmallorange.com/ [snip

Re: [Catalyst] Dreamhost for Catalyst

2007-02-15 Thread Toby Corkindale
Danny Warren wrote: Here is the part where you get flooded with host recommendations from everyone! I use these guys: http://asmallorange.com/ [snip] I was able to compile everything else I needed for catalyst in my home dir, and had a fastcgi + catalyst setup going without any problems.

Re: [Catalyst] Dreamhost for Catalyst

2007-02-15 Thread Toby Corkindale
essentially get your own machine (via Xen VPS), allowing you install and run whatever you want on it. - Jim Toby Corkindale wrote: Toby Corkindale wrote: Hi guys, was chatting to someone about hosting a low-traffic Catalyst site, and the subject of Dreamhost came up - they (apparently) offer

[Catalyst] Dreamhost for Catalyst

2007-02-14 Thread Toby Corkindale
Hi guys, was chatting to someone about hosting a low-traffic Catalyst site, and the subject of Dreamhost came up - they (apparently) offer particularly cheap virtual servers (about £5/month), and judging by their website, you receive a shell and can compile your own apps, including it says,

Re: [Catalyst] Dreamhost for Catalyst

2007-02-14 Thread Toby Corkindale
Toby Corkindale wrote: Hi guys, was chatting to someone about hosting a low-traffic Catalyst site, and the subject of Dreamhost came up - they (apparently) offer particularly cheap virtual servers (about £5/month), and judging by their website, you receive a shell and can compile your own

Re: [Catalyst] Preferred Ajax framework

2007-01-11 Thread Toby Corkindale
Mesdaq, Ali wrote: Hello everyone new to the list and new to catalyst in general. I am still trying to figure out best ways of using it in our environment with least amount of pain. To do that I am trying to plan it out before I start really getting my hands dirty. My question is what is

Re: (off-topic) Re: [Catalyst] Preferred Ajax framework

2007-01-11 Thread Toby Corkindale
Carl Franks wrote: On 11/01/07, Toby Corkindale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Attempts to correct said documentation by me failed, as you need to sign a disclosure saying your contributions are owned by the Dojo Foundation (so they can publish a book later) ... The CLA ( http://dojotoolkit.org

[Catalyst] Dojo madness

2006-11-15 Thread Toby Corkindale
I'm totally stumped. I have two extremely simple webpages, one of which causes IE to crash with an error Operation aborted, and another that works fine. The only difference between them is the use of a base tag in the header. $ diff breaks.html works.html 5d4 base

[Catalyst] Documentation bug in Catalyst::Request

2006-10-18 Thread Toby Corkindale
Bug in Catalyst::Request. It says: $req-action Returns the requested action as a Catalyst::Action object. However, it just returns the action, (ie. foo/bar). To get a genuine Catalyst::Action object, you need to call $c-action. I'd want to keep backwards compatibility, so maybe note in

Re: [Catalyst] C::P::PageCache patch for reducing duplicate processing

2006-06-23 Thread Toby Corkindale
Perrin Harkins wrote: On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 14:01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or have the first hit after the expire set the expire time counter to the next interval so the next hit does not even think to rebuild. Then you can also rebuild the cache to a temp name and overwrite the

Re: [Catalyst] C::P::PageCache patch for reducing duplicate processing

2006-06-23 Thread Toby Corkindale
Perrin Harkins wrote: Toby Corkindale wrote: Perrin Harkins wrote: FYI, that's how Mason does it. What is the behaviour for the first and second requests, before there is *any* cached content available? In Mason? The same as any other request for un-cached content. You can read

[Catalyst] C::P::PageCache patch for reducing duplicate processing

2006-06-22 Thread Toby Corkindale
Hi, There's a patch attached for Catalyst::Plugin::PageCache. (It's not final, but more a request for comments on it so far. In particular, some better way than using flock()) PageCache's objective is to let you cache pages that are heavy to create. However, the potential exists for a page to