From: Dan Dascalescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Two weeks ago, I embarked on building a web application and researched
the Perl framework offers. Catalyst seemed the most mature, flexible
and with the best community support. I went to the documentation - in
POD format. Not a big deal. I reached the
On 12/2/06, Sebastian Riedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
So I still believe in Catalyst, but my opinion is that The elegant
framework should first prove that it is really elegant.
That slogan was chosen at a different time, long ago, i don't think it
applies anymore.
On 12/2/06, Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, there are more ways to do it in every language, but for perl, the
correct expression should be: There are too many ways to do it. :-)
There is no the most important templating system in perl, or the best
module for creating
I would tend to agree.
Since I'm just currently learning Catalyst, I find the DBIx documentation
to be a bit on the poor side.
The examples are very simple, and not quite varied enough. Having a
complete description/usage of many-to-many schemas would help.
I've done some mistakes while
On 2 Dec 2006, at 15:15, Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
On 12/2/06, Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, there are more ways to do it in every language, but for
perl, the
correct expression should be: There are too many ways to do it. :-)
There is no the most
On 12/2/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(and what would people say to re-doing the tutorial to add back in a
couple chapters that -don't- use DBIC at the beginning, and then
perhaps an additional one at the end that uses another model (SVN or
LDAP spring to mind) ?)
One that uses
On 2 Dec 2006, at 15:47, Marc Espie wrote:
I would tend to agree.
Since I'm just currently learning Catalyst, I find the DBIx
documentation
to be a bit on the poor side.
The examples are very simple, and not quite varied enough. Having a
complete description/usage of many-to-many schemas
On Saturday 02 December 2006 13:50, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: Dan Dascalescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Two weeks ago, I embarked on building a web application and researched
the Perl framework offers. Catalyst seemed the most mature, flexible
and with the best community support. I went to the
On Saturday 02 December 2006 08:35, Sebastian Riedel wrote:
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
So I still believe in Catalyst, but my opinion is that The elegant
framework should first prove that it is really elegant.
That slogan was chosen at a different time, long ago, i don't think it
applies
