you could probably google for google and it would be on about page 2 ...
On 5/11/07, Michael Reece [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now the next time this happens, googling for cpantools.org will find
this thread and all will be clear!
___
List:
Le 10 mai 07 à 17:23, Tobias Kremer a écrit :
But, this does raise another question I have. There is plethora of
modules
that are to help Perl be more OO like and stricter which is
cool, but
are there any good de-facto standard modules that are used by the
majority of
people wishing
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:43:57AM +0200, David Morel wrote:
Le 10 mai 07 à 17:23, Tobias Kremer a écrit :
But, this does raise another question I have. There is plethora of
modules
that are to help Perl be more OO like and stricter which is
cool, but
are there any good de-facto
now the next time this happens, googling for cpantools.org will find
this thread and all will be clear!
On May 11, 2007, at 4:40 AM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Daniel Hulme [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-10 23:50]:
No, but on finding it not working my first guess was that he
mistyped it, so I tried
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:02:00PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
This is as opposed to the historical Catalyst plugin pattern of jam a
gazillion methods into Context ;)
Sometimes I wonder if that one is actually a conspirancy by the local
breweries.
--
Matt S Trout Need help with
* A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-10 16:14]:
* Anthony Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-10 16:00]:
Why not use Attribute::Protected to define private etc. methods
Because it does not actually prevent private methods in
subclasses from overriding ones in their superclasses, moves
* Anthony Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-10 16:00]:
Why not use Attribute::Protected to define private etc. methods
Because it does not actually prevent private methods in
subclasses from overriding ones in their superclasses, moves
error detection to compile time, adds overhead to every
good enough reason not to use it then if you ask me ;)
Have only played with it but haven;t taken it seriously myself.
But, this does raise another question I have. There is plethora of modules that
are to help Perl be more OO like and stricter which is cool, but are there
any good
But, this does raise another question I have. There is plethora of modules
that are to help Perl be more OO like and stricter which is cool, but
are there any good de-facto standard modules that are used by the majority of
people wishing to be more OO compliant.
That'd be Moose, I
Anthony Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/10/2007 10:04:33
AM:
good enough reason not to use it then if you ask me ;)
Have only played with it but haven;t taken it seriously myself.
But, this does raise another question I have. There is plethora of
modules that are to help Perl be
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:23:41PM +0200, Tobias Kremer wrote:
But, this does raise another question I have. There is plethora of modules
that are to help Perl be more OO like and stricter which is cool, but
are there any good de-facto standard modules that are used by the majority
No, I don't need to learn OO as I'm happy with it. It's just that while looking
at patterns and how Java does them, for example, I start having a rummage
around CPAN to see what's there to help me i.e Class::Decorator seemed like a
good toy ... but doesn;t work.
And then all this other stuff
* Anthony Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-10 18:15]:
Esp now as I've discovered cpantools.org which is great for
showing up packages that otherwise I'd never have come across.
$ host cpantools.org
Host cpantools.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
$ host www.cpantools.org
Host
sorry, cpantools.com
I always write .org. Don't know why it's .com
A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Anthony Gardner [2007-05-10 18:15]:
Esp now as I've discovered cpantools.org which is great for
showing up packages that otherwise I'd never have come across.
$ host cpantools.org
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:19:38PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Anthony Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-10 18:15]:
Esp now as I've discovered cpantools.org which is great for
showing up packages that otherwise I'd never have come across.
$ host cpantools.org
Host cpantools.org
* Daniel Hulme [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-10 20:45]:
If you'd googled rather than hosting you'd have found that
Anthony meant to say cpantools.com.
Condescending much?
xoxo,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
___
List:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:00:07PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Daniel Hulme [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-10 20:45]:
If you'd googled rather than hosting you'd have found that
Anthony meant to say cpantools.com.
Condescending much?
No, but on finding it not working my first guess was that
* Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-09 16:05]:
All problems in computer science can be solved by another
level of indirection (Butler Lampson)
... except the problem of having too many levels of
indirection.
The funny thing is: that’s wrong!
You can add a layer of abstraction on top
On Wed, 9 May 2007, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Delegation means that the caller communicates only with the
object that delegates and doesn’t know which object does the
actual work. That’s not what’s happening in your example.
Something like this would be delegation:
sub trail_length {
my
Hi Bill,
* Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-09 18:35]:
Not really a Cat question, but do many people use lexical vars
to store their private methods in plugins?
my $private_method = sub { ... }
later:
$self-$private_method( $foo );
I thought of that recently and have
On 10/05/2007, at 1:51 AM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Wed, 9 May 2007, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Delegation means that the caller communicates only with the
object that delegates and doesn’t know which object does the
actual work. That’s not what’s happening in your example.
Something like this would
21 matches
Mail list logo
