Re: [Catalyst] Using Workflow with Catalyst (was Making Controllers thin and Models thick)

Hello, I am the current maintainer of the Workflow module on CPAN and I just want to add my 2 cents here, since Matts' comments on Workflow is in my opinion are both unfair and inapproriate and not particularly constructive. I am sure he has more constructive criticism and I would like

Re: [Catalyst] Using Workflow with Catalyst (was Making Controllers thin and Models thick)

On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:52:58PM +0200, jonasbn wrote: Hello, I am the current maintainer of the Workflow module on CPAN and I just want to add my 2 cents here, since Matts' comments on Workflow is in my opinion are both unfair and inapproriate and not particularly constructive. I

Re: [Catalyst] Using Workflow with Catalyst (was Making Controllers thin and Models thick)

On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 07:52:46PM +0100, Ian Docherty wrote: Matt Thank you for that succinct analysis. :) I will give Class::Workflow a good look in that case. Do you know how far off Persistence using DBIC is with this? I think it would be essential for the Catalyst application I have

[Catalyst] Using Workflow with Catalyst (was Making Controllers thin and Models thick)

Thanks for pointing out the workflow CPAN module. I am very interested in this for my current project and must spend some time looking at it. Has anyone actually used workflow within a Catalyst application and can they give the list their opinion and experiences with it? Regards Ian Docherty

Re: [Catalyst] Using Workflow with Catalyst (was Making Controllers thin and Models thick)

On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:43:12PM +0100, Ian Docherty wrote: Thanks for pointing out the workflow CPAN module. I am very interested in this for my current project and must spend some time looking at it. Has anyone actually used workflow within a Catalyst application and can they give the

Re: [Catalyst] Using Workflow with Catalyst (was Making Controllers thin and Models thick)

--- Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:43:12PM +0100, Ian Docherty wrote: Thanks for pointing out the workflow CPAN module. I am very interested in this for my current project and must spend some time looking at it. Has anyone actually used workflow

Re: [Catalyst] Using Workflow with Catalyst (was Making Controllers thin and Models thick)

Matt Thank you for that succinct analysis. :) I will give Class::Workflow a good look in that case. Do you know how far off Persistence using DBIC is with this? I think it would be essential for the Catalyst application I have in mind. Since this seems to be straying from discussion of

Re: [Catalyst] Using Workflow with Catalyst (was Making Controllers thin and Models thick)

John Napiorkowski wrote: - ... It's an awful horrible piece of shit. Class::Workflow was written by our very own Yuvla Kogman to replace it and works very nicely with Catalyst. Matt, I'd appreciate when you have a little time if you could share some more detailed thoughts on this,