On Tuesday 19 June 2007 09:47:50 am Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 07:11:10AM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:10:25AM -0500, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> > > http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/2007/06/05/WhatRubyOnRailsCanLearnFro
> > >mASPNET.aspx
> > >
> > > a
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 07:11:10AM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:10:25AM -0500, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> > http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/2007/06/05/WhatRubyOnRailsCanLearnFromASPNET.aspx
> >
> > and realized that Catalyst is just as "vulnerable" as Rails. So, I wrot
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:10:25AM -0500, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/2007/06/05/WhatRubyOnRailsCanLearnFromASPNET.aspx
>
> and realized that Catalyst is just as "vulnerable" as Rails. So, I wrote
> Catalyst::Plugin::FormCanary to solve the problem. If you care a
Hello cata-listers,
I was reading an article about CSRF last night:
http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/2007/06/05/WhatRubyOnRailsCanLearnFromASPNET.aspx
and realized that Catalyst is just as "vulnerable" as Rails. So, I wrote
Catalyst::Plugin::FormCanary to solve the problem. If you care about
