Re: [Catalyst] ::Model::SomeTable-some_method() problem

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:03:59AM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: It's a bug. Shame nobody using a setup like yours can have tested the dev releases like we asked. Yes, I did (half) apologise for this in my first post. I realise it's the fault of people like me. I just hadn't had the tuits to

Re: [Catalyst] accessing action methods in a TT view

why not just $c-forward?On 7/13/06, Rodney Broom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Guillermo Roditi [EMAIL PROTECTED] whatabout $c-controller()That appears to work, thanks. The remaining cludge I've got in my code is carrying around the context. So far, I only need this for access to the stash. For

Re: [Catalyst] ::Model::SomeTable-some_method() problem

On 7/14/06, Chisel Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just hadn't had the tuits to slap the dev release on my laptop. It kinda sounds like I'm the only Pg/Model::DBIC user out there at the moment ... :) There was one other guy who popped into #catalyst complaining about a messed up Model::CDBI

Re: [Catalyst] ::Model::SomeTable-some_method() problem

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 08:56:12AM -0500, Brandon Black wrote: There was one other guy who popped into #catalyst complaining about a messed up Model::CDBI model from the same bug, so you're not *completely* alone - you're just in unfavorable company :) Oh, I thought you lot were the

[Catalyst] testing database contents

All This is another one of those what is the best practice/how are other people doing this questions. Im testing a Catalyst app with Test::WWW::Mechanize::Catalyst. Part of the testing involves submitting data that goes into the database. Id like to confirm that the data is actually

Re: [Catalyst] Bug in uri_for()

Paul Makepeace scribbled on 7/13/06 7:44 AM: Folks may already know about this, sorry I haven't checked RT etc: I've just upgraded from 5.66 to 5.70 and noticed a bug with uri_for - it seems that if one of the final-arg hash ref parameters has a value that is not something it's expecting

Re: [Catalyst] Bug in uri_for()

On 7/14/06, Peter Karman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Makepeace scribbled on 7/13/06 7:44 AM: Folks may already know about this, sorry I haven't checked RT etc: I've just upgraded from 5.66 to 5.70 and noticed a bug with uri_for - it seems that if one of the final-arg hash ref

[Catalyst] restarting mod_fcgid processes

Is there any way to gracefully restart Catalyst FastCGI processes running under Apache/mod_fcgid without restarting Apache? I'm trying to write a Subversion post-commit hook that will do this, but failing. It seems like mod_fastcgi has an -autoUpdate flag that will check the modification time on

[Catalyst] Someone please benchmark and reply to this

http://www.digg.com/programming/Django_vs._Rails_vs._Symfony_Django_is_fastest Once again, Perl is left out in the cold. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo:

[Catalyst] Is users table primary key available in $c-user?

I want to update my join table 'user_quotes' using the logged-in user's id. By 'id' I mean the integer primary key from the users table.$c-user gives the username of the logged in user, so I could do a search on the users table by the unique username, but I'd rather not do that if it's already

Re: [Catalyst] Is users table primary key available in $c-user?

Dennis Daupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to update my join table 'user_quotes' using the logged-in user's id. I found it!my $user_id = $c-user-user-id;Weird, since my users table is named 'users' and not user. But I can't argue with what

Re: [Catalyst] Is users table primary key available in $c-user?

this should also work...$c-user-obj-id$user_row_obj = $c-user-objOn 7/14/06, Dennis Daupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Dennis Daupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to update my join table 'user_quotes' using the logged-in user's id. I found it!my $user_id = $c-user-user-id;Weird, since my users

Re: [Catalyst] Andre Giesler/HASCO ist außer Haus.

Matt S Trout wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will be out of the office starting 15.07.2006 and will not return until 31.07.2006. Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. And now unsubscribed. I dunno if this is an auto-reply or a retarded notifier that doesn't

Re: [Catalyst] Andre Giesler/HASCO ist außer Haus.

On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 03:36:26AM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: Matt S Trout wrote: Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. And now unsubscribed. I dunno if this is an auto-reply or a retarded notifier that doesn't exclude address boks, please fix it before you