Re: [Catalyst] Anybody else OSCONing?

2007-07-21 Thread Jonathan Rockway
On Friday 20 July 2007 08:31:26 pm Matt S Trout wrote: While I know of a few names who are, I bet there are more on here I don't know about and that a lot of us don't know about each other, so put your names here and let's see if we can meet up for a beer and some software hate. I'm going to

[Catalyst] RDBO/RHTMLO integration with Catalyst - work in progress

2007-07-21 Thread Alexandre Jousset
Sorry for the repost, the address for the RDBO list was wrong. -- Hello lists, Since I haven't seen any work like this before (if I'm wrong please give me pointers!) I started to write a Catalyst Controller

[Catalyst] RDBO/RHTMLO integration with Catalyst - work in progress

2007-07-21 Thread Alexandre Jousset
Hello lists, Since I haven't seen any work like this before (if I'm wrong please give me pointers!) I started to write a Catalyst Controller called Catalyst::Controller::RHTMLO to integrate RHTMLO (and a few bits of RDBO) to Catalyst the same way Catalyst::Controller::FormBuilder do.

[Catalyst] Re: [RHTMLO] RDBO/RHTMLO integration with Catalyst - work in progress

2007-07-21 Thread Peter Karman
check out Catalyst::Controller::Rose on cpan. It has a different philosophy than what you've described. But if you find features missing that you think would make it more useful, please send me patches/tests/docs etc. You might consider writing a new Catalyst::Controller::Rose::SomeThing to

[Catalyst] Re: [RHTMLO] RDBO/RHTMLO integration with Catalyst - work in progress

2007-07-21 Thread Alexandre Jousset
Peter Karman a écrit : check out Catalyst::Controller::Rose on cpan. It has a different philosophy than what you've described. But if you find features missing that you think would make it more useful, please send me patches/tests/docs etc. You might consider writing a new

Re: [Catalyst] Re: [RHTMLO] RDBO/RHTMLO integration with Catalyst - work in progress

2007-07-21 Thread Peter Karman
Alexandre Jousset wrote on 7/21/07 1:12 PM: Peter Karman a écrit : check out Catalyst::Controller::Rose on cpan. It has a different philosophy than what you've described. But if you find features missing that you think would make it more useful, please send me patches/tests/docs etc. You

Re: [Catalyst] Re: [RHTMLO] RDBO/RHTMLO integration with Catalyst - work in progress

2007-07-21 Thread Alexandre Jousset
Peter Karman a écrit : I'm still studying them to be sure what is the right thing to do... But any advice is welcome... C::C::Rose takes the thin controller/fat model approach. Look at the example app in the t/examples dir to see one implementation. Done. I prefer to follow the

Re: [Catalyst] Suggestion for FastMmap related plugin handling

2007-07-21 Thread Ash Berlin
Seems like a bug in Cache::FastMmap. I'll get round to fixing it in my fork (Cache::FastMmap::With::Win32) - that or get co-maint on the proper one. Fancy writing a me a failing test case against either CPAN'd modules? apv wrote: I got a small bite by unexpected behavior when setting the

Re: [Catalyst] Suggestion for FastMmap related plugin handling

2007-07-21 Thread Ashley
On Jul 21, 2007, at 2:11 PM, Ash Berlin wrote: Seems like a bug in Cache::FastMmap. I'll get round to fixing it in my fork (Cache::FastMmap::With::Win32) - that or get co-maint on the proper one. Fancy writing a me a failing test case against either CPAN'd modules? Thanks. I'll give it a

[Catalyst] New auth stuff and LDAP store...

2007-07-21 Thread Wade . Stuart
Folks, I have been wracking my head on this for a few days now (with jayk and mst offering much appreciated support on irc). It appears that the LDAP store (both .4 and .5) does not play nicely with the new auth .10 changes. From what I have been able to diagnose it appears as though

Re: [Catalyst] New auth stuff and LDAP store...

2007-07-21 Thread Jay K
For the benefit of the list: This issue has been resolved. It turned out to be a disagreement between what C::P::Authenticaiton was trying to place in $user-store () and what LDAP was trying to place in $user-store() LDAP was correct, and C::P::Authentication should keep it's grubby little