Just out of curiosity - are you going to use MojoMojo as base for the wiki part?
--
Zbyszek
On 6/6/07, Jmax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings Catalyst Developers,
I have been working with a friend of mine on a website of his, which has
quite a bit of traffic, and a large community. We are
Il giorno mer, 06/06/2007 alle 16.45 -0400, Jmax ha scritto:
Greetings Catalyst Developers,
I have been working with a friend of mine on a website of his, which has
quite a bit of traffic, and a large community. We are in need of a
second developer, and are hoping that one of you would be
Sorry for the post to the list I truly hate Reply-To header My
mail reader has a 'reply to all' butto just for replying to mailing
lists... Well, I'll be more attentive in the future...
--
Leo
signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
On Wednesday, 6 June 2007, Leo Cacciari wrote:
I'm planing to develop a Catalyst::Model::DNS, allowing Catalyst
applications to access (and update through dynamic queries) a Domain
Name Service.
I am working on a Catalyst app that also needs to provision DNS records ...
but I am doing this by
Sorry, wrong subject...reposting...
On Jun 7, 2007, at 3:53 AM, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
mia wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:18:33PM -0700, mla wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:29:12PM -0700, mla wrote:
Is it not possible to offer the current
mia wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:18:33PM -0700, mla wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:29:12PM -0700, mla wrote:
Is it not possible to offer the current Catalyst instance through
a class method? Something analogous to Apache-request, rather
than
I do something very similar. Here is the piece of code you need to
get you going (I originally got my example from the list back in Feb or Mar):
package MyApp::Model::FooDB;
use base 'Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema';
sub ACCEPT_CONTEXT {
my $self = shift;
my $c = shift;
my $schema
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:55:16AM -0700, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
mia wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:18:33PM -0700, mla wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:29:12PM -0700, mla wrote:
Is it not possible to offer the current Catalyst instance through
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:43:59AM +0200, Leo Cacciari wrote:
Sorry for the post to the list I truly hate Reply-To header My
mail reader has a 'reply to all' butto just for replying to mailing
lists... Well, I'll be more attentive in the future...
And mine (mutt) lets you hit 'r', 'n',
Hi,
I am trying to use 2 Catalyst applications on the same web server, using
mod_perl.
The problem is that I can run only one of them, no matter which one. If I
put them both to run, the web server doesn't want to start, and it doesn't
write any error in the error log.
I think there might
Peter Flanigan wrote:
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Virtualhost 127.0.0.1:80
They cannot both listen on the same address and port
As far as I can see these are virtual hosts and MyAppX run through a
perl handler ... there's no problem with such kind of setup,
perhaps Octavian is
From: Peter Flanigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Virtualhost 127.0.0.1:80
They cannot both listen on the same address and port
Both virtualhosts have the same IP and port, but they use a different server
name.
I also have another virtualhost that listens to this IP and
* Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-07 16:10]:
And mine (mutt) lets you hit 'r', 'n', enter to reply to the
original poster even with reply-to munging on.
You can also say `subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your
.muttrc, following which you can use “L” to reply to the list and
“r” to reply
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 06:55:40PM +0300, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use 2 Catalyst applications on the same web server, using
mod_perl.
The problem is that I can run only one of them, no matter which one. If I
put them both to run, the web server doesn't want to start,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:35:00AM -0500, Guy Debord wrote:
Using the helpers, I created a Model Bar
tmp_server lists all of its classes and instances like such...
| TMP::Model::Bar | instance |
| TMP::Model::Bar::Bar |
From: Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In httpd.conf I have:
LoadFile d:/usr/bin/perl58.dll
LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so
Include e:/web/MyApp1/include/httpd.txt
Include e:/web/MyApp2/include/httpd.txt
Do you have a NameVirtualHost directive?
Yes I have, and the applications
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:46:16PM +0300, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
If I try starting apache directly with:
httpd -k start -n apache2.2
...it doesn't display any error message. I see that it doesn't start when I
try to use this command again and I see that it doesn't complain that a
port
Brian Kirkbride wrote:
Hello all,
I've got an Catalyst webapp that has several areas:
/admin/...
/manage/...
/client/...
All of these are accessible from one site:
mysite.com/admin
mysite.com/manage
mysite.com/client
Now, here's the tricky part. I'd really like to have a proxy or
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:55:16AM -0700, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
mia wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:18:33PM -0700, mla wrote:
Assuming I'm not using threads, how would I hurt myself by
subclassing Catalyst and supplying a MyApp-context that returns
Leo Cacciari wrote:
I'm planing to develop a Catalyst::Model::DNS, allowing Catalyst
applications to access (and update through dynamic queries) a Domain
Name Service.
What's the benefit of making this a *Catalyst* model? Doesn't that
couple your DNS module to your web framework?
Why not just
Il giorno gio, 07/06/2007 alle 13.10 -0700, mla ha scritto:
What's the benefit of making this a *Catalyst* model? Doesn't that
couple your DNS module to your web framework?
Why not just write a DNS module with all your dynamic update methods
and then add a wrapper to use it as a Catalyst
Leo Cacciari wrote:
Il giorno gio, 07/06/2007 alle 13.10 -0700, mla ha scritto:
What's the benefit of making this a *Catalyst* model? Doesn't that
couple your DNS module to your web framework?
Why not just write a DNS module with all your dynamic update methods
and then add a wrapper to use it
Matt et al,
All of my models -- such as TMP::Model::Foo -- created by the helper
-- use DBIC::Schema as a base class and are configured to use
TMP::Schema as their schema_class.
Each model that I created through the helper ends up creating classes
in the namespace, one for each table in my
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:40:00PM -0500, Guy Debord wrote:
Matt et al,
All of my models -- such as TMP::Model::Foo -- created by the helper
-- use DBIC::Schema as a base class and are configured to use
TMP::Schema as their schema_class.
Yes. You only need *one* model per DBIC::Schema!
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:04:02PM -0700, mla wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:55:16AM -0700, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
mia wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:18:33PM -0700, mla wrote:
Assuming I'm not using threads, how would I hurt myself by
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Matt S Trout wrote:
I'm not fond of any magic global if I can possibly avoid it - I find it
tends to encourage tight coupling of code and action at a distance and
makes testing and debugging messy.
I agree. A singleton is basically a _very_ thin mask for a global.
I
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:04:02PM -0700, mla wrote:
Other than the fact you don't like the style, why is it bad?
You don't like singletons?
I'm not fond of any magic global if I can possibly avoid it - I find it
tends to encourage tight coupling of code and action at a
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:12:10PM -0700, mla wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:04:02PM -0700, mla wrote:
Other than the fact you don't like the style, why is it bad?
You don't like singletons?
I'm not fond of any magic global if I can possibly avoid it - I find it
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:12:10PM -0700, mla wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:04:02PM -0700, mla wrote:
Other than the fact you don't like the style, why is it bad?
You don't like singletons?
I'm not fond of any magic global if I can possibly avoid
Running a production Catalyst app as a FastCgiExternalServer.
Occasionally it crashes. I'd like to trap that event, use StackTrace
and send the web admin email (with the trace) to alert them to the
crash. Ideally I would even like to have the app respawned. Haven't
figured out how ...
30 matches
Mail list logo
