On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:23:21AM +0300, vb wrote:
There is absolutely no reason to use Prototype.
The Prototype + Scriptaculous javascript framework is junk.
There is absolutely no reason to use... Prototype + Scriptaculous
It doesn't work very well, the syntax is terrible, it
Hello list,
I started a project using Catalyst with DBIx::Class and FormBuilder.
This is far from a CRUD application. In fact it is a Slashdot-like
application.
I've heard about Rose and I'm planning to move from FormBuilder to
Rose::HTML::Object that seems better designed.
My
On 7/4/07, Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Prototype + Scriptaculous javascript framework is junk.
It doesn't work very well, the syntax is terrible, it will break other
javascript on the page just by being included, and the cool effects it
includes aren't even very good. There
On 7/4/07, Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that this is a terrible way to do things. Perl has the right idea
with $sigils, so at least functions look different from other @things. Oh,
and you know... a lexical scope.
If you feel the need for complicated scoping rules in
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 11:15:57AM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
For those out there who like TT2's mini-language, I've been using it
for many years without ever encountering any of the problems described
in this thread. I never add any variables to the stash from inside my
templates
stephen joseph butler wrote:
On 7/3/07, Andrew Hayward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if it possible to construct an HTML form such that the
back end automatically creates a hash (or an array) based on the naming
scheme.
Catalyst::Plugin::Params::Nested
On 7/5/07, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I was advising, basically, except that I would tell
people to use INCLUDE instead of PROCESS.
Else you'll be violating your own rule not to add variables to
the stash from inside a template, as soon as any of your blocks
are
