On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 04:04:14PM +0100, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> I am talking here though about scenarios where it's more "AHAH" than
> "AJAX" ... the function that makes the request just sticks it as-is
> into the page, rather than doing some kind of decode on it. Mostly
> because that seems si
On 1/6/07, Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:24:37PM +0100, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> I just started using AJAX (or AHAH actually ... ) a little. I like the
> lightness it gives but I've been slow to pick up because I want to be
> sure that pages work without js,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:24:37PM +0100, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> I just started using AJAX (or AHAH actually ... ) a little. I like the
> lightness it gives but I've been slow to pick up because I want to be
> sure that pages work without js, and I haven't figured out a generic
> method yet. I'm
I just started using AJAX (or AHAH actually ... ) a little. I like the
lightness it gives but I've been slow to pick up because I want to be
sure that pages work without js, and I haven't figured out a generic
method yet. I'm sure others are ahead of me on this ...
Typical scenario without AJAX :
