On 06/02/2009, at 1:20 PM, Ashley wrote:
On Feb 5, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Kieren Diment wrote:
On 06/02/2009, at 9:14 AM, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jason Gottshall wrote:
Just out of curiosity, who is authoring it?
It looks like the book is already listed on apress.com:
http:/
On Feb 5, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Kieren Diment wrote:
On 06/02/2009, at 9:14 AM, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jason Gottshall wrote:
Just out of curiosity, who is authoring it?
It looks like the book is already listed on apress.com:
http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430223650
Oh s
You can at least be
assured that I'll buy the book...
Bob
Kieren Diment wrote:
On 06/02/2009, at 9:14 AM, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jason Gottshall wrote:
Just out of curiosity, who is authoring it?
It looks like the book is already li
On 06/02/2009, at 9:14 AM, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jason Gottshall wrote:
Just out of curiosity, who is authoring it?
It looks like the book is already listed on apress.com:
http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430223650
Oh shit, that means we've actually got to finish it
kd and mst are authoring it, me thinks.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jason Gottshall wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity, who is authoring it?
>>
>
> It looks like the book is already listed on apress.com:
>
> http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430223
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jason Gottshall wrote:
Just out of curiosity, who is authoring it?
It looks like the book is already listed on apress.com:
http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430223650
Kevin
http://www.RawFedDogs.net
http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org
Bruceville, TX
Si hoc legere scis nimi
Kieren Diment wrote:
The next book will be published by Apress and we're producing the first
draft at the moment. It should be out in time for OSCON in june.
Just out of curiosity, who is authoring it?
--
Jason Gottshall
jgottsh...@capwiz.com
___
J. Shirley wrote on 2009-02-05:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Robert L Cochran
> wrote:
>> Dangerous? Well I don't think this module runs around with a Uzi
>> spraying everyone.
>>
>> I don't think it is a good practice to force an install on errors. You
>> should always get to the bottom o
The next book will be published by Apress and we're producing the
first draft at the moment. It should be out in time for OSCON in june.
Kieren
On 06/02/2009, at 6:03 AM, Robert L Cochran wrote:
Is a new Catalyst book being written? I have the original Rockway
book,
my interest is in a n
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Robert L Cochran
wrote:
> Dangerous? Well I don't think this module runs around with a Uzi
> spraying everyone.
>
> I don't think it is a good practice to force an install on errors. You
> should always get to the bottom of why the errors are happening to start
> w
Dangerous? Well I don't think this module runs around with a Uzi
spraying everyone.
I don't think it is a good practice to force an install on errors. You
should always get to the bottom of why the errors are happening to start
with. Once you do and have applied a fix, it should install cleanly, a
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Byron Young wrote:
> Hi J Shirley
>
> I'm trying to install your neat C::V::Email package but I'm running into some
> test failures. I thought you might like to know about them. The test
> failures look benign to me so I'm going to force install, but let me kno
Hi J Shirley
I'm trying to install your neat C::V::Email package but I'm running into some
test failures. I thought you might like to know about them. The test failures
look benign to me so I'm going to force install, but let me know if you think
that the errors could be dangerous.
Let me kn
Is a new Catalyst book being written? I have the original Rockway book,
my interest is in a new work-in-progress book.
If so, is there an early-access electronic version available?
Thanks
Bob Cochran
Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
___
List: Catalyst@lists.
My installation of Fedora 10 x86_64 is using Fedora-packaged Perl
(perl-5.10.0-53.fc10.x86_64) and the perl-Catalyst-Runtime
(perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.7015-1.fc10.noarch) and it doesn't seem to be
maintained; there is no 5.71000 release as an RPM package. I have read
the thread from last summer abou
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:28:57PM +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:10:07AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > Same problem.
>
> Would you mind preparing a testcase for this?
I can try. See attached diff against svn 9215.
$ prove -vl t/live_fork.t
t/live_fork
1..15
Te
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Anton Katsarov wrote:
> В 08:30 -0800 на 05.02.2009 (чт), J. Shirley написа:
>> If 5 seconds works for you, cool.
>>
>> Just as a benchmark, all my apps send full HTML in under .8 seconds
>> (or I tune them until they do). It's relatively easy to get FCGI
>> suppor
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Anton Katsarov wrote:
> В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
>
> > It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
> > the first byte.
>
> I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some changes to
> my .h
В 08:30 -0800 на 05.02.2009 (чт), J. Shirley написа:
> If 5 seconds works for you, cool.
>
> Just as a benchmark, all my apps send full HTML in under .8 seconds
> (or I tune them until they do). It's relatively easy to get FCGI
> support and a lot of cheap hosts provide it.
I don't want to argue
2009/2/5 J. Shirley :
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Anton Katsarov wrote:
>> В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
>>
>>> It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
>>> the first byte.
>>
>> I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some c
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Anton Katsarov wrote:
> В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
>
>> It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
>> the first byte.
>
> I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some changes to
> my .htaccess to se
В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
> It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
> the first byte.
I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some changes to
my .htaccess to serve the static directly from the webserver and now it
loads for 5
Bill Moseley wrote on 02/05/2009 09:10 AM:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:23:03PM +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:25:15PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
>>> I have a module that uses IO::Pipe and when I run it under the
>>> Catalyst server the pipe doesn't work (see below).
>>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:10:07AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Same problem.
Would you mind preparing a testcase for this?
TestApp::Controller::Fork / t/live_fork.t already has similar tests. You
can run them against the dev server using t/optional_http-server.t.
--
BOFH excuse #86:
Runt pack
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:23:03PM +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:25:15PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > I have a module that uses IO::Pipe and when I run it under the
> > Catalyst server the pipe doesn't work (see below).
>
> Please try to reproduce with Catalyst-Runti
Hi all,
I just got a request for an Catalyst article that will be published in a
special edition of the iX magazine. I wont have time myself so I thought
maybe here might be some folks from Germany interested in taking up the
offer to promote Catalyst and earn a few bucks. I've written an article
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:51:18PM +, Peter Edwards wrote:
>Was that the change to the catching of signal SIGCHLD ?
Exactly.
--
BOFH excuse #66:
bit bucket overflow
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.c
>
> 2009/2/5 Florian Ragwitz
>
>> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:25:15PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
>> > I have a module that uses IO::Pipe and when I run it under the
>> > Catalyst server the pipe doesn't work (see below).
>>
>> Please try to reproduce with Catalyst-Runtime-5.8000_06. It has a fix
>>
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:25:15PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I have a module that uses IO::Pipe and when I run it under the
> Catalyst server the pipe doesn't work (see below).
Please try to reproduce with Catalyst-Runtime-5.8000_06. It has a fix
related to spawning external processes from the
I am used to the idea that I can have a parent template (autohandler in
Mason), which provides basic navigation and status display for the site;
autohandler then invokes another template (a master template for that
particual page's content) which itself uses various odd templates for
Usin
J. Shirley schrieb:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Malcolm
wrote:
On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Gene Selkov wrote:
I understood as much. The problem I am grappling with is the complexity of
the web pages I have to present, with many different states and
transitions. There is no way
31 matches
Mail list logo