From: Charlie Garrison garri...@zeta.org.au
The fix is given in the warning message, eg:
__PACKAGE__-config(default_view = 'TT'); # or whatever the name of your
view is.
Then you have a 'default' view for your app and Catalyst doesn't need to
choose one
Good evening,
On 22/03/10 at 3:09 AM -0700, Ovid
publiustemp-catal...@yahoo.com wrote:
Actually, after some discussion with the AutoCRUD author, it
was generally agreed it would be safer to not integrate
AutoCRUD directly into my app. A different app running on a
different
- Original Message
From: Charlie Garrison garri...@zeta.org.au
I'd really like to get more info on that.
Looking at all the actions for my app in the debug output on startup, I can
see
lots of private and chained actions for AutoCRUD, and they are all under the
/autocrud path.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charlie,
I'm the author of AutoCRUD, and fully support the route Ovid has
taken, indeed it's how we use AutoCRUD at my workplace: under its
own Apache Location with specific Apache ACLs for admin staff.
On 22/03/2010 11:32, Charlie Garrison
Good evening,
On 22/03/10 at 4:41 AM -0700, Ovid
publiustemp-catal...@yahoo.com wrote:
I can't answer these questions. I can only refer you to the rt queue discussion:
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=55742
Thanks, that answered some things, but also just made others
even more
Good morning,
Thanks for the reply, and that means much of my previous message
can be ignored.
On 22/03/10 at 12:28 PM -, Oliver Gorwits
oliver.gorw...@oucs.ox.ac.uk wrote:
On 22/03/2010 11:32, Charlie Garrison wrote:
What part of AutoCRUD is accessed outside the /autocrud path?
Could anyone point me to docs that say what needs to be changed to get the app
to work when installed as an application in a pre-existing apache setup? my app
is installed under http://myurl.com/myapp and can't run directly from / as
this app is just one of many tools running on the webserver.
On 22 March 2010 17:04, Charles cshtr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Could anyone point me to docs that say what needs to be changed to get the
app to work when installed as an application in a pre-existing apache setup?
my app is installed under http://myurl.com/myapp and can't run directly from
/ as
I have an application using DBIx::Class::Schema. In the
application config file, I have:
Model::DB
schema_class MyApp::Schema
connect_info
...various necessary stuff here...
/connect_info
/Model::DB
Controller::One
someattribute value
/Controller::One
DB::Two
anotherattribute
Hi all,
I'm not sure what I did, but recently, my perl Makefile.PL run time dropped
from 4 minutes down to about 40 seconds. The latter still seems rather slow. A
generic Makefile.PL on my box (generated with catalyst.pl MyApp) takes about
1.5 seconds to run.
The slowdown appears to be when
Wow, is that on an NFS-mounted partition or something? Something is very
wrong.
Cheers, Peter
On Mar 22, 2010 7:24 PM, Ovid publiustemp-catal...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not sure what I did, but recently, my perl Makefile.PL run time
dropped from 4 minutes down to about 40 seconds. The
From: Peter Edwards pe...@dragonstaff.co.uk
To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Sent: Mon, 22 March, 2010 19:30:13
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Slow Makefile.PL
Wow, is that on an NFS-mounted partition or something? Something is very wrong.
Nope. It's on my Macbook Pro's
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Ovid publiustemp-catal...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does this look familiar to anyone?
I don't use the Makefile.PL all that often so I hadn't noticed, but my
10.6.2 box reports similar results:
Total Elapsed Time = 50.86615 Seconds
User+System Time = 48.08246 Seconds
- Original Message
From: kevin montuori montu...@gmail.com
I don't use the
Makefile.PL all that often so I hadn't noticed, but my
10.6.2 box reports
similar results:
Total Elapsed Time = 50.86615 Seconds
If I move
this out of my home directory and into /tmp it's as fast as
Hi,
we have an app working under apache/mod_perl (and behind a reverse
proxy) that we would like to optimize. We're currently evaluating
performance, checking memory usage, etc.
For this we thought about using some stress testing package that would
be flexible in allowing us to specify a number
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.dewrote:
* Gabriel Andrade gabi...@gmail.com [2010-03-16 16:50]:
http://code.google.com/p/wkhtmltopdf/
That looks interesting, thanks!
* Adam Sjøgren a...@koldfront.dk [2010-03-16 18:15]:
An alternative could perhaps be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charlie,
On 22/03/2010 13:08, Charlie Garrison wrote:
The self-contained part is what I really wanted to know. I'm
aware the base can change to something else; I'm fine with that.
I'm just looking for a shotgun (all or nothing) approach.
In
17 matches
Mail list logo
