On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:14 AM, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
/usr/local/perl-5.10.1/lib/site_perl/5.10.1/Catalyst/Engine/HTTP/Prefork.pm
line 35.
The line in question is:
@ARGV = @{ $options-{argv} };
So you should make sure your server.pl
On May 7, 2009, at 8:35 AM, Tomas Doran wrote:
Anthony Gladdish wrote:
Attached are my diffs and I've put the version number up to 0.09.
Passes in Catalyst::Runtime 5.8 + perl 5.10.
Passes in Catalyst::Runtime 5.7011 + perl 5.8.8.
Great, thanks for the patches.
Applied as r10035 with
On Oct 9, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
That is, if I want to test my Catalyst app against a real
server (for example, if I have server configuration settings
in an httpd.conf file, or some other reason why I need to test
my app against Apache instead of a Perl HTTP object), but I
On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Stephan Jennewein wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the UploadProgress plugin.
At the moment it doesn't update the progressbar during the upload,
but the
first time it does is when I cancel the upload or it has finished. I
think
the problem is that I'm using Mason
On May 14, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
Can C::P::UploadProgress be made to work under Windows?
I've seen that it requires C::P::Cache::FastMmap and this module
can't be installed under Windows, even after installing
Cache::FastMmap::WithWin32.
It will work with any
On Apr 7, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Andy Grundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-06 17:10]:
Multiple processes is really the only way to go for a web
server.
You mean, a webserver for running Catalyst apps? ’Cause in the
general case, a single-process, select-based server
On Apr 6, 2008, at 3:08 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
It is based on Net::Server::Prefork so it has all of the preforking
features you'd expect (min servers, spares, max servers, flock-
based accept() serialization, etc). It also requires 2 XS modules
to further improve performance:
On Apr 6, 2008, at 3:36 AM, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
little bit. I was disappointed in the POE engine and came to the
conclusion that POE, while tons of fun to use, is not the right
Just when POE went 1.0! Not fair!!
POE rocks, but a single process just doesn't work for Catalyst,
because
On Apr 6, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
* On Sun, Apr 06 2008, Andy Grundman wrote:
On Apr 6, 2008, at 3:36 AM, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
little bit. I was disappointed in the POE engine and came to the
conclusion that POE, while tons of fun to use, is not the right
Just when POE
Finally got around to releasing an engine I have been working on for a
little bit. I was disappointed in the POE engine and came to the
conclusion that POE, while tons of fun to use, is not the right
framework for something like a Catalyst engine. So this engine is
designed to replace
On Apr 1, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Bill Moseley wrote:
C::Engine::Apache does this:
# If we are running as a backend server, the user will always
appear
# as 127.0.0.1. Select the most recent upstream IP (last in the
list)
my ($ip) = $headers-{'X-Forwarded-For'} =~ /([^,\s]+)$/;
On Mar 14, 2008, at 5:57 AM, Matt Lawrence wrote:
Fayland Lam wrote:
sub test_body : Local {
my ($self, $c) = @_;
$c-res-body(*STDOUT);
print a\n;
print b\n;
}
Have you tried passing the glob as a reference?
$c-res-body(\*STDOUT);
It looks like that's at least part of your
On Feb 29, 2008, at 11:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
I do not know if this test has already been posted on the list
Why these bad performances ?
http://www.alrond.com/en/2007/jan/25/performance-test-of-6-leading-frameworks/
All in all seems like a well-done benchmark with lots of good
On Feb 29, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Andy Grundman wrote:
On Feb 29, 2008, at 11:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
I do not know if this test has already been posted on the list
Why these bad performances ?
http://www.alrond.com/en/2007/jan/25/performance-test-of-6-leading-frameworks/
All
On Feb 29, 2008, at 2:20 PM, Dab wrote:
Thank you for your answers
If asked that question is that I make a small application that takes
3 seconds per request with only one user. It has only 7 tables and
uses a lot of TT.
I forget to use /Template::Stash::XS, (thank /Andy) I will make a
On Dec 7, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Pablo Collins wrote:
Thanks guys for your help.
For clarity, I'd like to make the question webserver independent.
For now, I'm just talking about how to change the base url of an
application running in Catalyst::Engine::HTTP.
In Catalyst::Manual::Cookbook,
On Nov 11, 2007, at 11:28 AM, jagdish eashwar wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to retrieve into an array a list of values from a column
in a table using dbic and have it displayed in a drop down list in a
tt2 template. I am able to do the retrieval part, but the tt2 template
is displaying only the last
On Nov 9, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Jim Spath wrote:
When I run Catalyst out of a non root webserver location, e.g. /
myapp, $c-request-uri has an extra slash after the base url.
http://mydomain.com/myapp//
http://mydomain.com/myapp//some/action
Catalyst::Engine::CGI::prepare_path() is setting
On Nov 8, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
If I have a Catalyst application and I use
PerlResponseHandler Application::Name
in httpd.conf
and I load that module in a startup.pl file, what happends with the
modules that might be loaded by that Catalyst app?
Are they also
On Nov 8, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Ok, thank you. I know how to load the modules, but I just wanted to
know if all dependencies are loaded before server fork.
Yeah, they are. Catalyst will load all your controllers, models, etc,
and those will load all their modules, and
On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Bernhard Weisshuhn wrote:
Hi,
am I the only one who cannot get the lighttpd-fastcgi-tests for
Catalyst-Runtime-5.7011 to pass with the current lighttpd 1.4.18?
I've already incorporated a patch for content in 307 response bodies
from
On Nov 5, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Bernhard K. Weißhuhn wrote:
Andy Grundman schrieb:
On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Bernhard Weisshuhn wrote:
Hi,
am I the only one who cannot get the lighttpd-fastcgi-tests for
Catalyst-Runtime-5.7011 to pass with the current lighttpd 1.4.18?
[...]
1.4.18 passes
22 matches
Mail list logo
