[Catalyst] [IMPORTANT] TEST Catalyst::Runtime 5.7100 RC1 (aka 5.7099_02)

2008-07-17 Thread Brian Cassidy
Hey All, We're putting out one final development release before we go full bore with 5.7100. NB: It is IMPERATIVE that you TEST this release against YOUR code. Quoth mst: If you do not test now any bugs we ship with are your fault! -- so, there you have it :) Also, we've reworked the authors

Re: [Catalyst] [IMPORTANT] TEST Catalyst::Runtime 5.7100 RC1 (aka 5.7099_02)

2008-07-17 Thread J. Shirley
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Brian Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey All, We're putting out one final development release before we go full bore with 5.7100. NB: It is IMPERATIVE that you TEST this release against YOUR code. Quoth mst: If you do not test now any bugs we ship with

Re: [Catalyst] [IMPORTANT] TEST Catalyst::Runtime 5.7100 RC1 (aka 5.7099_02)

2008-07-17 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:21 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tests a-ok on two fairly complex apps here, both use chained and the standard assortment of plugins (Auth, Session, Cache, Params::Nested). Also tests fine with View::TT,Mason,Email Catalyst::Controller::DBIC::API and

Re: [Catalyst] [IMPORTANT] TEST Catalyst::Runtime 5.7100 RC1 (aka 5.7099_02)

2008-07-17 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Brian Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope I'm not speaking out of turn, but, I believe... As it turns out: [21:15] mst bricas: incidentally, you're wrong about catamoose - 5.80 trunk is where it's staying [21:15] mst bricas: we'll cut 5.80 straight off