so I don't really see the point of adding extra
decoding and encoding all over the place
Because it's security relevant. By now the article
http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=644786 should be well-known. Yes,
this specific circumstance shown there is difficult to trigger and
exploit. That's not the
While it's not Catalyst's fault, I've found over the years that interacting
with underlying libraries, databases and legacy systems is generally easier
when I *don't* try to force anything. I have custom code in place to deal
with know sources of inconsistent encodings (check to see if it's valid
On 10 March 2013 19:58, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
Does anyone have a strong opinion on this being added to their app by
default?
Does anyone have an app which needs you to NOT load the unicode plugin?
Speak now, or you're gonna have a bad time :)
Think I kind of meant to
From: Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org
To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:53 AM
Turning it into a role and making it optionally be applied would be a nice to
have (i.e. so people could turn it off if needed).
It working seamlessly with apps which already use the (old) plugin is a *must*
have (but to be fair - maybe we can just filter U::P::U::Encoding out of the
plugin
On 10/03/13 19:58, Tomas Doran wrote:
Does anyone have a strong opinion on this being added to their app by default?
Does anyone have an app which needs you to NOT load the unicode plugin? Speak
now, or you're gonna have a bad time :)
My views already encode the response body if required. If
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Peter Flanigan p...@roxsoft.co.uk wrote:
# Only touch 'text-like' contents
return $c-next::method(@_)
unless $c-response-content_type =~ /^text|xml$|javascript$/;
smells bad, it will apply to text/x-json but not application/json
The code
From: Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org
To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com; The elegant MVC web framework
catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:09 AM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Bill, I think there's general agreement that the plugin is stable enough
and right enough that it should represent core behavior. Although one of
Catalyst's strengths has been to be un-opinionated and leave stuff to
From: Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org
To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com
Cc: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release
@lists.scsys.co.uk
Sent: Sunday, March 3, 2013 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hey All,
http://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2013/03/catalyst-backup-for-next
On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:12 AM, John Napiorkowski wrote:
Bill,
I'd be open to it, if it seems like we always just need to add this. I'm not
enough an expert of unicode to understand the drawbacks, or why this was done
as a plugin in the first place. Is there a drawback, for example to
- Original Message -
From: Luis E. Muñoz luisemu...@gmail.com
To: John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com; The elegant MVC web framework
catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Cc:
Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release
On Mar 4
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:24 AM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://play-perl.org/quest/5134cdc18e0a96450f38
There was a discussion about this on #catalyst-dev and in general people
seem to think its ok.
Bill, are you up to giving the work a try? I'd be happy to mentor
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hey All,
http://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2013/03/catalyst-backup-for-next-release-on-play-perl.html
This is over on play Perl (http://play-perl.org/player/jnap) for your
comments and votes. Hope to
Hey All,
http://jjnapiorkowski.typepad.com/modern-perl/2013/03/catalyst-backup-for-next-release-on-play-perl.html
This is over on play Perl (http://play-perl.org/player/jnap) for your comments
and votes. Hope to see you there!
John
___
List:
16 matches
Mail list logo
