Dear all,
1) Since Catalyst::Plugin::FormValidator is considered a "thin" wrapper
around Data::FormValidator, shouldn't we be keeping the naming
conventions the same?
2) 'form' seems to call Data::FormValidator->check , why can't we call
it "check" instead of "form"?
3) the second parameter to the Data::FormValidator->check call - would
it not be better called as dfv_profile (as per Data::FormValidator's
documentation where this is the data form validator profile)?
Just my 2 cents to help lean out the learning curve for people wanting
to use Catalyst.
Extract : 'form' method source code
==========================
sub form {
my $c = shift;
if ( $_[0] ) {
my $form = $_[1] ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] : $_[0];
$c->{form} =
Data::FormValidator->check( $c->request->parameters, $form );
}
return $c->{form};
}
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
