Peter Karman wrote on 05/14/2009 01:51 PM:
> Louis Erickson wrote on 05/14/2009 09:39 AM:
>>
>> I'm using AuthTkt, and it works very well.
>
> glad to hear it.
>
> If you're using AuthTkt, then the whole cookie this is a non-issue. Just
> pass the ticket as a URL param like the tests do. The pl
Louis Erickson wrote:
Just today I spent time writing up some documentation patches you pointed
out I could contribute on my blog. I'm going to try and keep adding
things where I can.
Applied in another thread - keep up the good work :)
Random question about that... if I have diffs to send t
Louis Erickson wrote on 05/14/2009 09:39 AM:
>
> I'm using AuthTkt, and it works very well.
glad to hear it.
If you're using AuthTkt, then the whole cookie this is a non-issue. Just
pass the ticket as a URL param like the tests do. The plugin supports
both ways (cookie and param).
>
> Why did
I'm using AuthTkt, and it works very well.
Why didn't it occur to me to look at the tests for it?
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Peter Karman wrote:
> You can see the AuthTkt tests here[0]. The my_request() function just
> sets $ENV{COOKIE} and lets the standard AsCGI magic work. I'm sure
> that's a Bad
Louis Erickson wrote on 05/13/2009 12:07 AM:
> Can I just generate the cookie and put it in the cookie store directly
> before the query is made to the application? I can generate the cookie
> with the SSO library. I don't see a way to do that through either test
> tool.
>
I'm coming in lat
First, let me say that I am pleased and impressed with the responses. So
often I ask a question on a mailing list and get little or nothing back.
It is a real treat to see a place where that is not the case! Complete
sentences, coherent thoughts, *and* relevant answers to complex questions!
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:07:49PM -0700, Louis Erickson wrote:
>
> I've been neglecting my test scripts, and I'm finally getting to that
> before my app gets any bigger. I want to make sure I don't break anything
> that's working, and that it works as well as I think it does.
>
> I'm probably
Louis Erickson wrote:
> I'm probably going to have several questions in the next few days about
> tests.
As usual in these parts, all questions welcome, although you implicitly
volunteered to document anything not covered in the Manual/documentation
already. Well volunteered in advance. ;_)
I
2009/5/13 Louis Erickson
>
> I haven't been able to get a test user logging in and out yet, though.
>
> I have several sections of my application that redirect the user away if
> they are not logged in. I have another that returns a 404 if they don't
> have access, so prying users can't find it (
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Louis Erickson wrote:
>
> I've been neglecting my test scripts, and I'm finally getting to that
> before my app gets any bigger. I want to make sure I don't break anything
> that's working, and that it works as well as I think it does.
>
> I'm probably going to ha
I've been neglecting my test scripts, and I'm finally getting to that
before my app gets any bigger. I want to make sure I don't break anything
that's working, and that it works as well as I think it does.
I'm probably going to have several questions in the next few days about
tests. I think
11 matches
Mail list logo
