Re: [Catalyst] modperl 1.3 wierdness

2008-05-05 Thread Matt S Trout
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 11:19:24PM +1000, Toby Corkindale wrote: On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:22:49PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:30:53AM +1000, Toby Corkindale wrote: Unfortunately due to somewhat unusual app deployment tactics here, apps get installed

Re: [Catalyst] modperl 1.3 wierdness

2008-05-03 Thread Matt S Trout
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:30:53AM +1000, Toby Corkindale wrote: Unfortunately due to somewhat unusual app deployment tactics here, apps get installed manually, into their own little area, along with their required perl dependencies, thus losing the Makefile.PL, but also requiring that the

Re: [Catalyst] modperl 1.3 wierdness

2008-04-21 Thread Toby Corkindale
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:54:00PM +1000, Toby Corkindale wrote: Hi guys, I have an application that runs well on modperl 2.0, fcgi and the standalone server.. but due to some stubborn/paranoid sysadmins[1] we are going to have to run it under modperl 1.3. Footnotes: 1) This is their job, to

Re: [Catalyst] modperl 1.3 wierdness

2008-04-21 Thread Toby Corkindale
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:54:00PM +1000, Toby Corkindale wrote: Hi guys, I have an application that runs well on modperl 2.0, fcgi and the standalone server.. but due to some stubborn/paranoid sysadmins[1] we are going to have to run it under modperl 1.3. This has resulted in some