Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-07 Thread Bill Moseley
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:33 PM, J. Shirley jshir...@gmail.com wrote: This is where I actually really love ::REST. If you make a JSON call, then whatever is in the stash key that ::REST is returned to the client (via -status_ok) -- but if you combine this with chained and setup other data in

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-06 Thread David
: RE: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML Catalyst to serve a static file (which would only make sense if there *is* application logic) putting this in a View would be the Right Way. Yes my point exactly. That’s why I was comparing it to serving static image files and how it's

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-06 Thread J. Shirley
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:17 AM, David oldskif...@yahoo.es wrote: Exactly, as there is a little bit of application logic, so I need this process. Thanks for the solution Jay. I'll go for it. Just one last question. When you talk about using 'lib/MyApp/View/MyView.pm', you mean that is also

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-06 Thread Bill Moseley
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:34 AM, J. Shirley jshir...@gmail.com wrote: Just one last question. When you talk about using 'lib/MyApp/View/MyView.pm', you mean that is also correct to create a simple perl Module for your view. Then implement process method in the View.pm and forward the

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-06 Thread J. Shirley
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:34 AM, J. Shirley jshir...@gmail.com wrote: Just one last question. When you talk about using 'lib/MyApp/View/MyView.pm', you mean that is also correct to create a simple perl Module for your

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-06 Thread Bill Moseley
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:59 PM, J. Shirley jshir...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think the path taken with Catalyst::Action::REST is the best, but it does work very very well in my opinion and I certainly can't think of anything better. Being able to send to a serialization method based on the

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-06 Thread J. Shirley
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:59 PM, J. Shirley jshir...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think the path taken with Catalyst::Action::REST is the best, but it does work very very well in my opinion and I certainly can't think of

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-05 Thread J. Shirley
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:10 AM, David oldskif...@yahoo.es wrote: Hi, I need to generate an XML output (Content-type: application/xml), but this XML output is the XML content which is stored in an XML file. I don't need to dinamically generate this XML content. I have searched in google but I

RE: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-05 Thread Mesdaq, Ali
Maybe I am missing something but why is a view needed? If you are serving up a static file and its xml why don’t you just serve that file statically based on path? Is the header content-type not getting set properly for that file? Thanks, -- Ali Mesdaq

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-05 Thread David
my_TT_view TT'. David De: J. Shirley jshir...@gmail.com Para: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Enviado: vie,5 marzo, 2010 16:45 Asunto: Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:10 AM, David oldskif

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-05 Thread David
@lists.scsys.co.uk Enviado: vie,5 marzo, 2010 19:04 Asunto: RE: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML Maybe I am missing something but why is a view needed? If you are serving up a static file and its xml why don’t you just serve that file statically based on path? Is the header

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-05 Thread J. Shirley
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:46 AM, David oldskif...@yahoo.es wrote: Thanks Jay. I thought of that solution too when I had a look at Catalyst::Plugin::Static::Simple. But in this case, my doubt was, and is, how should I create the view through the helper? Most of the examples for creating views

RE: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-05 Thread Mesdaq, Ali
://www.WebsenseSecurityLabs.comhttp://www.websensesecuritylabs.com/ -- From: David [mailto:oldskif...@yahoo.es] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 10:49 AM To: The elegant MVC web framework Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML Well, as Catalyst works under MVC

Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-05 Thread J. Shirley
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Mesdaq, Ali ames...@websense.com wrote: To me this sounds like it’s the same issue as serving static images you wouldn’t create a view for that unless you need to wrap it around some application logic. Or at least that’s what it sounds like to me based on the

RE: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML

2010-03-05 Thread Mesdaq, Ali
-- -Original Message- From: J. Shirley [mailto:jshir...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 12:20 PM To: The elegant MVC web framework Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Best practices: XML output from static XML On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Mesdaq, Ali ames...@websense.com wrote: To me