Yes. If you detach(), you're basically saying 'do nothing more on
this request'. That plus the redirect mean that template processing
is not done, as I understand it. This is no doubt dealt with in the
action
Hi, Ian,
The app works fine except that I have set up an eval block within
kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
The app works fine except that I have set up an eval block within my
controller.
My detach call comes right after the redirect call.
It looks like this:
$c-res-redirect($c-uri_for('/users/subscriptions/added '));
$c-detach ();
What's
Another thought - what does $c-detach() do / what do you expect it
to
do? If you aren't detaching _to somewhere_, then why not just
return?
hello, tom,
Good arvo. From what I have read in some of the docs (sorry, I dont
have my bookmarks handy),
they did mention that after a redirection,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:09:19AM +1000, kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Hello, Oliver,
Good morning.
Referring to
http://kobesearch.cpan.org/htdocs/Catalyst-Runtime/Catalyst.html#c_gt_detach_class_method_arguments,
under $c-detach(),
it says that detach is the same as forward, but doesn't
Hi, everyone,
I know that most people here would understand redirect, forward and
detach well.
Unfortunately, there are people like myself who don't understand it that
well and hence, after looking at the CPAN catalyst docs and J.Rockway's
book, still fail to find a page that defines these methods
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:07 PM, kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Hi, everyone,
I know that most people here would understand redirect, forward and
detach well.
Unfortunately, there are people like myself who don't understand it that
well and hence, after looking at the CPAN catalyst docs and
On 27/4/09 13:35, J. Shirley wrote:
STOP. TOP. POSTING.
He didn't. It was a whole message without any previous content. Arguably
this might have been a new thread but it seems to continue the thread so
I think it was OK.
Since you're whining about posting etiquette, can I ask you to trim
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Simon Wilcox
sim...@digitalcraftsmen.netwrote:
On 27/4/09 13:35, J. Shirley wrote:
STOP. TOP. POSTING.
He didn't. It was a whole message without any previous content. Arguably
this might have been a new thread but it seems to continue the thread so I
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:55 PM, kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Hello, J. Shirley,
Thank you for your explaination. It made things much clearer and
confirmed a lotta things.
One last trivial question:
A redirect is to a URI, composed of however you make it. If you
preserve
the
2009/4/27 kakim...@tpg.com.au:
Hello, J. Shirley,
Thank you for your explaination. It made things much clearer and
confirmed a lotta things.
Akimoto-san,
people have been answering the questions that you've asked, but I
wanted to check up what it is that you're trying to do.
Tell me if I
* On Mon, Apr 27 2009, Simon Wilcox wrote:
On 27/4/09 13:35, J. Shirley wrote:
STOP. TOP. POSTING.
Bottom posting without trimming is just as bloody annoying as top posting.
YES, thank you. Top posting is much better than bottom-posting ok
after a 10-page email. Let's avoid both, eh?
* On Mon, Apr 27 2009, J. Shirley wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Simon Wilcox sim...@digitalcraftsmen.net
wrote:
Trimming is highly subjective and contextual, top posting is simply bad form.
FWIW, my mail client can convert top-posting to bottom-posting
automatically, but it can't
hello, J.Shirley,
Good morning. Sorry if this post is being replied to at the top of the
message
in light of not further causing some disastifactions in the mailing list
(majority).
Firstly, a big thank you for your response and confirmations.
Yep, I did try experimenting with my current app
Hello, Mr Wells,
Good morning and a big thank you for your reply.
It was pretty accurate. Last night, I managed to get my problem fixed by
using a redirect
prior to receiving your reply.
Basically, my solution was conceptually on the same lines as the
proposed solution
which you had given.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Jonathan Rockway j...@jrock.us wrote:
* On Mon, Apr 27 2009, J. Shirley wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Simon Wilcox
sim...@digitalcraftsmen.net wrote:
Trimming is highly subjective and contextual, top posting is simply bad
form.
FWIW, my mail
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:10 AM, kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
hello, J.Shirley,
Good morning. Sorry if this post is being replied to at the top of the
message
in light of not further causing some disastifactions in the mailing list
(majority).
Firstly, a big thank you for your response
Hello, Oliver,
Good morning.
Referring to
http://kobesearch.cpan.org/htdocs/Catalyst-Runtime/Catalyst.html#c_gt_detach_class_method_arguments,
under $c-detach(),
it says that detach is the same as forward, but doesn't return to the
previous action when processing is finished.
Comments?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:09 AM, kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Hello, Oliver,
Good morning.
Referring to
http://kobesearch.cpan.org/htdocs/Catalyst-Runtime/Catalyst.html#c_gt_detach_class_method_arguments
,
under $c-detach(),
it says that detach is the same as forward, but doesn't return
kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
hello, all,
I have a method in my controller which adds entries.
The method is setup to match the path of 'users/subscriptions/add'.
Upon successfully adding entries, I want the same method to be executed
again (only that the method will know which template
19 matches
Mail list logo
