Re: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-30 Thread Matt Rosin
One company mentioned their perl based large scale sns site at YAPC::Asia IIRC - sorry it might have been six apart as mentioned above, can't remember which. I do know they wrote their own system to be able to basically split and merge their user pool according to user name (alphabetical order)

RE: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-28 Thread Johan Lindstr
At 21:58 2007-10-26, Mesdaq, Ali wrote: I personally think that storing images in the DB is the best place to start because if other better solutions are available later you can very easily migrate. But if you start out with filesystem migration is a little bit more cludgy in my opinion. I mean

Re: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-28 Thread Brian Kirkbride
wrote: At 21:58 2007-10-26, Mesdaq, Ali wrote: I personally think that storing images in the DB is the best place to start because if other better solutions are available later you can very easily migrate. But if you start out with filesystem migration is a little bit more cludgy in my

Re: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-26 Thread J. Shirley
On 10/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NFS gets a bad wrap, as long as you do sane planning and lay it out properly NFS works very very well for servicing static files to the webservers. Breaking out to S3 seems silly (Amazon is out to make money with S3 and if you do it

RE: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-26 Thread Mesdaq, Ali
-- -Original Message- From: J. Shirley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 12:31 PM To: The elegant MVC web framework Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning On 10/26/07, Mesdaq, Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote