Re: [Catalyst] Which JS framework to use?

2011-03-13 Thread shawn wilson
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Alex Povolotsky wrote: > Hello! > > I'm QUITE new to JS, and tried my best to evade it, but now I have to face > that thing. > > First of all, I'd need autocompletion and form extension ("Add one more > field" button, to clone selectbox+text fields) > > I understa

Re: [Catalyst] Which JS framework to use?

2011-03-13 Thread Peter Edwards
On 13 March 2011 08:15, Alex Povolotsky wrote: > I'm QUITE new to JS, and tried my best to evade it, but now I have to face > that thing. > > First of all, I'd need autocompletion and form extension ("Add one more > field" button, to clone selectbox+text fields) > > I understand that it can be do

Re: [Catalyst] Which JS framework to use?

2011-03-13 Thread Richard Thomas
My experience with mootools is quite limited - and I certainly don't want to start Palestine for Geeks by arguing javascript frameworks on the Catalyst framework list! - but I did intend to make the point previously that much of the syntax of jQuery will feel familiar to anyone with a perl backg

Re: [Catalyst] Which JS framework to use?

2011-03-13 Thread Marilyn Burgess
I enjoy using mootools. For a well thought out comparison of mootools and jquery check out: http://jqueryvsmootools.com - Marilyn On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Richard Thomas wrote: > jQuery, without a shadow of doubt. It's getting to be like CPAN, where the > trick is picking the right p

Re: [Catalyst] Which JS framework to use?

2011-03-13 Thread Richard Thomas
jQuery, without a shadow of doubt. It's getting to be like CPAN, where the trick is picking the right plug-in from the assortment available. Whatever "modern web" stuff you want to do, you're unlikely to go wrong with jQuery. cheers RET Sent from my iPhone On 13/03/2