On 6 Nov 2007, at 08:17, John Goulah wrote:
On Nov 5, 2007 12:37 PM, Joe Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi folks:
This should be an easy one. I read and read and read. The
manual is
fine, but my reading skills may be in doubt.
This is what I want to do. I want to set a simple
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:37:27PM -0500, Joe Landman wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> This should be an easy one. I read and read and read. The manual is
> fine, but my reading skills may be in doubt.
>
> This is what I want to do. I want to set a simple variable named
> myvar in myapp.yml. Then
Ferruccio Zamuner wrote:
Hi,
I've found some strange behaviours from Catalyst about CGI::FormBuilder
and TT2:
I have seen similar things happen with C::C::FormBuilder, and there is
an old thread on this list from when I was writing
C::C::FormBuilder::MultiForm where I was talking with Juan
On Nov 5, 2007 12:37 PM, Joe Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> This should be an easy one. I read and read and read. The manual is
> fine, but my reading skills may be in doubt.
>
> This is what I want to do. I want to set a simple variable named
> myvar in myapp.yml. Then
Hi,
I've found some strange behaviours from Catalyst about CGI::FormBuilder
and TT2:
example 1:
in
- edit.tt ---
[% IF FormBuilder %]
TRUE
[% ELSE %]
FALSE
[% END %]
- end
- myapp::Controller::mycontroller ---
sub edit : Local Form {
my ( $self, $c ) = @_;
On Nov 5, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Bernhard K. Weißhuhn wrote:
Andy Grundman schrieb:
On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Bernhard Weisshuhn wrote:
Hi,
am I the only one who cannot get the lighttpd-fastcgi-tests for
Catalyst-Runtime-5.7011 to pass with the current lighttpd 1.4.18?
[...]
1.4.18 passes
Andy Grundman schrieb:
> On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Bernhard Weisshuhn wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> am I the only one who cannot get the lighttpd-fastcgi-tests for
>> Catalyst-Runtime-5.7011 to pass with the current lighttpd 1.4.18?
>>
>> [...]
>
> 1.4.18 passes all tests for me on OSX, except the 307
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> * On Monday 05 November 2007 08:50:03 am Matt Lawrence wrote:
>
>>> Jonathan Rockway wrote:
>>>
How is Module::Mask different from Devel::Hide?
>> The interface is different, Module::Mask has a slightly more flexible OO
>> interface, but it doe
Hi,
On 11/5/07, James R. Leu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the file handle exhaustion I'll mention below
> is due to something that C::P::JSONRPC is doing wrong, I'll accept that
> and just use the 'hack' I have in place.
If Catalyst::Engine doesn't cleanup the body of the request, it
doesn't r
Hi folks:
This should be an easy one. I read and read and read. The manual is
fine, but my reading skills may be in doubt.
This is what I want to do. I want to set a simple variable named
myvar in myapp.yml. Then I want to pick it up later on.
So far so good, I have
myvar: blahbla
I'd like to start by saying thank you to all Catalyst developers
and contributors for providing such a flexible and powerful
application development framework.
I realize that C::P::JSONRPC is not the best way to add JSONRPC to my
application, but at the time (6 months ago) I didn't know any better
Thank you for describing those commands for me. They are helpful.
And sorry for my question that generated some off topic messages.
Octavian
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Johnstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The elegant MVC web framework"
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 2:20 PM
Sub
* On Monday 05 November 2007 08:50:03 am Matt Lawrence wrote:
> > Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> >> How is Module::Mask different from Devel::Hide?
>
> The interface is different, Module::Mask has a slightly more flexible OO
> interface, but it does have some limitations that Devel::Hide doesn't.
> Plus
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> Jonathan Rockway wrote:
>
>> Matt Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> I should probably point out that I'm the Module::Mask author, just in
>>> the interests of full disclosure ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> How is Module::Mask different from Devel::Hide?
>>
The interface is
On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Bernhard Weisshuhn wrote:
Hi,
am I the only one who cannot get the lighttpd-fastcgi-tests for
Catalyst-Runtime-5.7011 to pass with the current lighttpd 1.4.18?
I've already incorporated a patch for content in 307 response bodies
from http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/t
On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Bernhard Weisshuhn wrote:
Hi,
am I the only one who cannot get the lighttpd-fastcgi-tests for
Catalyst-Runtime-5.7011 to pass with the current lighttpd 1.4.18?
I've already incorporated a patch for content in 307 response bodies
from http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/t
Hi,
am I the only one who cannot get the lighttpd-fastcgi-tests for
Catalyst-Runtime-5.7011 to pass with the current lighttpd 1.4.18?
I've already incorporated a patch for content in 307 response bodies
from http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/ticket/1412 .
But still the tests below fail.
Can some ki
It's probably useful to tell you what these various commands are actually
doing, rather than just saying check-this and check-that...
lsof = LiSt Open Files
basically it lists every file that a process has open, that includes the
executable file itself and any libraries or shared code. The b
18 matches
Mail list logo
