Hi guys,
I have an application that runs well on modperl 2.0, fcgi and the standalone
server.. but due to some stubborn/paranoid sysadmins[1] we are going to have to
run it under modperl 1.3.
This has resulted in some wierdness I haven't seen before, and I wondered if
anyone else had hit it?
I'll
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 15:15 +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
> So far as I can see, all we really need to do is supply a proxy of the
> common Tree::Simple method from the C::Stats object through to $self->{tree}
> and we're done. That'll provide compatibility with obvious usages without
> adding any si
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 10:39 -0500, Cory Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Jon Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I apologise to anyone who was inconvenienced by this change.
> I've
> written a guide to upgrading for anyone who was using
J. Shirley wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 8:01 AM, David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
It seems that 'autoflush' doesn't mean what it usually does in
Catalyst::Log::Log4perl. It usually means that a write should happen
immediately, and not be buffered.
That isn't the behaviour in Cat
On 21 Apr 2008, at 02:43, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Kieren Diment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-20 15:45]:
perl -e 'for $i (1 .. 48) { system "lynx -dump -nolist
http://www.jrock.us/fp2008/catalyst/slide$i.html"}' > jrock.txt
I would have proposed that, but any multipart slides are called
t
* Kieren Diment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-20 15:45]:
> perl -e 'for $i (1 .. 48) { system "lynx -dump -nolist
> http://www.jrock.us/fp2008/catalyst/slide$i.html"}' > jrock.txt
I would have proposed that, but any multipart slides are called
things like slide17a.html, slide17b.html etc so your s
From: "Kieren Diment" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yeah, there's an accessability issue there. Anyway:
perl -e 'for $i (1 .. 48) { system "lynx -dump -nolist http://
www.jrock.us/fp2008/catalyst/slide$i.html"}' > jrock.txt
Thank you for those pages. I've also found and downloaded the source code.
It
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:51:44PM +1000, Yao Wang wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> Recently, i am looking for some modules for unit testing. I have seen
> Catalyst::Test, Test::WWW::Mechanize::Catalyst etc, i think they are the
> testing tools for application, not for unit testing. When i do the unit
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:38:46AM +0300, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> From: "Dave Rolsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, John Romkey wrote:
> >
> >>I suspect that most Catalyst users build their applications so that the
> >>controllers do too much work. I certainly did, and I'm graduall
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 01:56:04AM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> >> It seems that 'autoflush' doesn't mean what it usually does in
> >>Catalyst::Log::Log4perl. It usually means that a write should happen
> >>immediately, and not be buffered.
> >>
> >> That isn't the behaviour in Catalyst::Log::Log4p
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:39:50AM -0500, Cory Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Jon Schutz
> > Nevertheless I stand by my comment that anyone who digs through the
> > source code to find an internal object or function and then chooses to
> > use that in external code does so at thei
* Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-20 13:40]:
> From: "Jonathan Rockway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> http://www.jrock.us/fp2008/catalyst/start.html
>>
>> Using a DBIC-based model works the same way.
>
> Thank you Jonathan but I couldn't access any kind of helpful
> text on that page.
It’s
On 20 Apr 2008, at 21:26, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: "Jonathan Rockway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* On Sun, Apr 20 2008, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Please tell us if we can find an example of putting the logic in the
model than call those methods from the controller.
http://www.jrock.us/fp2008/ca
This is a great tutorial - many thanks.
It also introduces Moose as a Object/Class framework which for some reason I
hadn't come across before - at least until I stumbled across a recent
conversation on the IRC channel. While I'm sure I would have seen this soon
enough, I'm very glad I saw this be
From: "Jonathan Rockway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* On Sun, Apr 20 2008, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Please tell us if we can find an example of putting the logic in the
model than call those methods from the controller.
http://www.jrock.us/fp2008/catalyst/start.html
Using a DBIC-based model works th
* On Sun, Apr 20 2008, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Please tell us if we can find an example of putting the logic in the
> model than call those methods from the controller.
http://www.jrock.us/fp2008/catalyst/start.html
Using a DBIC-based model works the same way.
Regards,
Jonathan Rockway
--
p
> also looking to automate the process of generating (and more
> importantly, maintaining) the WSDL file describing those services. It
> looks like Pod::WSDL does a good job of this, so I was wondering
> whether anyone was already working on getting Pod::WSDL to generate
> the WSDL file direct
From: "Dave Rolsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, John Romkey wrote:
I suspect that most Catalyst users build their applications so that the
controllers do too much work. I certainly did, and I'm gradually
rewriting mine to move most of the work into the model. Where before my
cont
18 matches
Mail list logo
