On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 19:18 +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:29:56AM +0930, Jon Schutz wrote:
I'm making a stand here for the rights of all developers! Backward
compatibility is a must for defined interfaces, but to carry that
through to say that all design decisions
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 19:16 +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:49:56AM +0930, Jon Schutz wrote:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 15:15 +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
So far as I can see, all we really need to do is supply a proxy of the
common Tree::Simple method from the C::Stats
* On Thu, Apr 24 2008, Jon Schutz wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 19:16 +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
That's not a compromise, that's an AUTOLOAD, which is poor coding practice
when you know what methods the object on the other side exists.
Indeed it is a compromise.
It's not a compromise. It's
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 04:16 -0500, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
No problems, if that's what the Catalyst standard says; I must have
missed it. Where is it? I'd like to consult it on a number of
matters... please post the link.
Basically it's more of a zeitgeist than an actual document.
On Apr 24, 2008, at 2:49 AM, Jon Schutz wrote:
Basically it's more of a zeitgeist than an actual document.
There are
some things that the community has decided and just do. One is not
breaking things or adding features between point releases. We've
fucked
this up a number of times, but
* Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-24 11:25]:
* On Thu, Apr 24 2008, Jon Schutz wrote:
No problems, if that's what the Catalyst standard says; I
must have missed it. Where is it? I'd like to consult it on
a number of matters... please post the link.
Basically it's more of a
* On Thu, Apr 24 2008, Jon Schutz wrote:
A standard is not a standard unless it's written down as a common
reference for everybody to see. People in the community come and go and
don't all have the same history, or longevity of memory for all the
let's make this a standard decisions that
* Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-24 19:10]:
* On Thu, Apr 24 2008, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-24 11:25]:
* On Thu, Apr 24 2008, Jon Schutz wrote:
No problems, if that's what the Catalyst standard says; I
must have missed it. Where
Hi Wade.Stuart,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-25 00:30]:
Aristotle Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008 12:32:12 PM:
* Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-24 19:10]:
* On Thu, Apr 24 2008, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
