Re: [Catalyst] Users hierarchy

2008-06-06 Thread Andrew Rodland
On Friday 06 June 2008 10:46:53 pm Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> * On Fri, Jun 06 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Gulp, that should have been 0 :)
>
> Actually, it should have been "!" as in "if(!$found ...)".  Perl has a
> variety of "false" values including 0, undef, and the empty string.
> Perl's built-in boolean operators return "undef" or "1" as false or
> true, but other libraries use other values ("" and "hey, it worked!",
> for example).

Actually (0==1) is "" and defined, while we're picking nits. The point stands 
that if you want to test for truth you should simply test for truth.

Andrew

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


Re: [Catalyst] Authorization ACL: future plans?

2008-06-06 Thread Jonathan Rockway
* On Fri, Jun 06 2008, ivorw wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> (Yuval please note: this concerns one of your modules)
>
> Are there any plans afoot to build on
> Catalyst::Plugin::Authorization::ACL? I have a requirement for a couple
> of enhancements, and I'd like to sound out the list before jumping in
> and coding.
>
>
> 1. I'd quite like the idea of a generic "resource", that users have
> access to, rather than just a controller method. The resource could be
> or correspond to a file on the server's fs, a wiki page, a diary
> appointment, etc.
>
> The resource would have a set of permissions, controlled through the model:
>  * See   (whether this resource actually appears at all)
>  * Read (Are the contents of the resource visible/executable?)
>  * Modify
>  * Delete
>  * Grant (who can change the permissions for this resource)

I don't think a Catalyst plugin is where this sort of code belongs.  It
belongs in a layer unrelated to Catalyst.  I also don't think this can
be done generically enough to make it useful.  (Too generic and it won't
save any time, too specific and you'll be the only user.)

For something DBIx::Class-specific, look at
DBIx::Class::Schema::RestrictWithObject.  Basically, you have an object
that does the access control (per-resultset), and your application never
sees data that the user isn't allowed to see.  This is the right level
of generic-ness.

Authorization::ACL is completely differnet,BTW.  It's nice for walling
off part of your application; mainly so you don't have to check
$c->user_exists for every action that $c->user touches.  But, it doesn't
try to guess what your application's data means, it just turns part of
the app off based on some rules you set up.  Again, the right level of
generic-ness.

What I'm trying to say is that access control and C::P::A::ACL are two
different things.  Catalyst shouldn't even be in your mind when you are
designing the access rules and code for your data.

> The resource also has an owner (user) and a group (role).
> Each of the permissions above can be set to one of 'owner', 'group',
> 'world' or none.
>
> Proposed module name: Catalyst::Plugin::Authorization::ACL::Resource
>
> 2. Full blown access control lists
>
> For more sophisticated requirements, we have an actual list:
>
> Include: list of entities
> Exclude: list of entities
>
>
> each entity can be one of the following:
>  * A user
>  * 'owner'
>  * A role
>  * 'group'
>  * An ACL (i.e. nesting)
>
> This enhances option 1 above by allowing the permission to be an ACL
> besides 'owner', 'group', 'world' or none.
>
> Proposed module name: Catalyst::Plugin::Authorization::ACL::Full
>
> What do people think? Feedback please.
>
> By the way in case you are wondering, I am looking to write a CMS that
> sits on top of Catalyst.

Write the CMS first, then factor out the access control code.  If you do
it the other way around, it probably won't turn out the way you want.
(Nothing is worse than writing a library and then having your
application that uses it work around it.  Trust me, I've done that.)

Regards,
Jonathan Rockway

-- 
print just => another => perl => hacker => if $,=$"

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


Re: [Catalyst] Users hierarchy

2008-06-06 Thread Jonathan Rockway
* On Fri, Jun 06 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gulp, that should have been 0 :)

Actually, it should have been "!" as in "if(!$found ...)".  Perl has a
variety of "false" values including 0, undef, and the empty string.
Perl's built-in boolean operators return "undef" or "1" as false or
true, but other libraries use other values ("" and "hey, it worked!",
for example).

Additionally, 0 is "==" to a variety of true values, including the
string "0 but true".

So just use "!$boolean" to test if something is false :)

Regards,
Jonathan Rockway

-- 
print just => another => perl => hacker => if $,=$"

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


RE: [Catalyst] Using URIs for my app in another program

2008-06-06 Thread Byron Young

Tomas Doran wrote on 2008-06-06:
>
> On 7 Jun 2008, at 01:17, Byron Young wrote:
>> Is there any way to fake a request when my app starts?  It seems
>> like a bit of a catch-22 -- I need to know a URL in order to fake
>> the request, but in order to generate the URL I need to have a
>> request...
>  The problem which you have here is that the application doesn't know
> what URLs it's attached to until run time.
>
> Remember - you can have multiple virtual hosts pointing to the same
> application instance, therefore catalyst *can't* know in advance
> where it is going to be served from.
>

True.  All I need to know in this case is just one valid URL, though.

> The simple perl HTTP engine which script/myapp_server.pl uses prints a
> nice message with the app URL - but that's because it's a toy compared
> to what you might do in real deployment.
>
>> Am I doomed to storing the URL for my 'populate database with urls'
>> action in a config file and updating it by hand when I move the web app?
>  I think so, but I think that you *want* to do this. Otherwise, how do
> you deal with testing the app? And also testing your thing which
> requests the app. Surely you're gonna want to be able to test against
> demo servers you've brought up on localhost?
>

Actually, that's specifically the use case I'm thinking of here.  Each 
developer on this project has his own testing setup on the dev machine, while 
the production version runs on another host.  Each test setup includes a 
database, daemon, and web app.  We do use config files to point everything to 
the right codebase and database, so it's not the end of the world to add 
another entry for the url, but I try to be careful of the amount of 
configuration we need.  I want to avoid the situation where a developer forgets 
to change his dev config file to point to his dev web app and so his daemon 
ends up talking to the production server instead, potentially resulting in 
something bad happening.  So, if there is some totally automated way to do 
things instead, I opt for that.

Of course, this may just be exposing some bad practices on our end wrt to dev 
environments and config files and protecting the production server from 
fallible developers such as myself.

> I think that you're trying to solve the wrong problem here, sorry. To be
> honest - how often are you really going to move the webapp once it's
> deployed? What's wrong with giving it it's own DNS CNAME which you
> switch between boxen hosting it?
>

Yeah, that's true - we probably won't move the production app, and we'll use a 
CNAME if we do.

Thanks for your help
Byron

> Cheers
> Tom
>



___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


Re: [Catalyst] Using URIs for my app in another program

2008-06-06 Thread Tomas Doran


On 7 Jun 2008, at 01:17, Byron Young wrote:
Is there any way to fake a request when my app starts?  It seems  
like a bit of a catch-22 -- I need to know a URL in order to fake  
the request, but in order to generate the URL I need to have a  
request...


The problem which you have here is that the application doesn't know  
what URLs it's attached to until run time.


Remember - you can have multiple virtual hosts pointing to the same  
application instance, therefore catalyst *can't* know in advance  
where it is going to be served from.


The simple perl HTTP engine which script/myapp_server.pl uses prints  
a nice message with the app URL - but that's because it's a toy  
compared to what you might do in real deployment.


Am I doomed to storing the URL for my 'populate database with urls'  
action in a config file and updating it by hand when I move the web  
app?


I think so, but I think that you *want* to do this. Otherwise, how do  
you deal with testing the app? And also testing your thing which  
requests the app. Surely you're gonna want to be able to test against  
demo servers you've brought up on localhost?


I think that you're trying to solve the wrong problem here, sorry. To  
be honest - how often are you really going to move the webapp once  
it's deployed? What's wrong with giving it it's own DNS CNAME which  
you switch between boxen hosting it?


Cheers
Tom


___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


Re: [Catalyst] Users hierarchy

2008-06-06 Thread sindharta_tanuwijaya
Gulp, that should have been 0 :)

Sindharta

Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * On Tue, Jun 03 2008, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:
> while ($found==false && $ancestor) {

Perl does not have a "false" operator.

Regards,
Jonathan Rockway

-- 
print just => another => perl => hacker => if $,=$"

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

 

 
-
GANBARE! NIPPON! Chance to win 50,000 Yahoo! Points!
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


RE: [Catalyst] Using URIs for my app in another program

2008-06-06 Thread Byron Young

J. Shirley wrote on 2008-05-01:
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Byron Young
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  Hey J.  Yes, that could work too, but it requires making a call
> to the catalyst app, which means at least one hard-coded url will
> be in the daemon.  I considered having a page on my app that would
> just serve up a requested url, which is similar to your proposal,
> but I'd rather avoid hard-coding any urls in the daemon.
>>
>>  Thanks for the suggestion.
>
>
> Not necessarily hard-coded; you can store that either A) in the daemon
> config, B) with the jobs that are sent in or C) in the DB somewhere.
>

Finally getting around to trying this (catalyst app generates and stores URLs 
in a database that a separate daemon program later includes in email reports).  
I would like my app to be able to generate the URLs when it start up, but as 
pointed out I need an HTTP request to be able to generate the URL.

Is there any way to fake a request when my app starts?  It seems like a bit of 
a catch-22 -- I need to know a URL in order to fake the request, but in order 
to generate the URL I need to have a request...

Unfortunately, I can't rely on sending the URL in with the jobs that are 
scheduled from the web app, because there is a script that can schedule jobs as 
well that knows nothing of the catalyst app.

Am I doomed to storing the URL for my 'populate database with urls' action in a 
config file and updating it by hand when I move the web app?

Thanks
Byron

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


RE: [Dbix-class] Re: [Catalyst] untainting utf8 text for db

2008-06-06 Thread Mesdaq, Ali
No escape sequence should get through if you reject any characters
outside of the allowed characters. For example you could just reject the
input and prompt for another input if this regex matches
(?:[^a-zA-Z0-9 _]+)
So escape sequences shouldn't affect this test.

Thanks,
--
Ali Mesdaq (CISSP, GIAC-GREM)
Security Researcher II
Websense Security Labs
http://www.WebsenseSecurityLabs.com
--

-Original Message-
From: Daniel McBrearty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 11:07 PM
To: The elegant MVC web framework
Cc: DBIx::Class user and developer list
Subject: [Dbix-class] Re: [Catalyst] untainting utf8 text for db

Thanks for the suggestions. Indeed, specifying a list of chars which is
clean (e.g. [a-zA-Z0-9_] for a username in English) is optimum, and I
prefer that. But when you are working with fully multilingual material,
this becomes pretty much impossible. As the site in question is all
about language learning and could eventually handle any language, that
is the issue.

Rejecting some of the suspicious chars you suggest is something I will
do - but even that is not foolproof as there are various ways (more than
one, IIRC, but I'm not sure what they all are) of using escape sequences
to get through.

Of the list you suggest, I'd need to keep (, ), ? - all the rest I could
kill quite happily.

Again, thanks for the input. I'm going to forward this to the
DBIx::Class list (as that is probably where it should have gone in the
first place).

___
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive:
http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 


 Protected by Websense Messaging Security -- www.websense.com 

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


[Catalyst] Authorization ACL: future plans?

2008-06-06 Thread ivorw
Hi guys,

(Yuval please note: this concerns one of your modules)

Are there any plans afoot to build on
Catalyst::Plugin::Authorization::ACL? I have a requirement for a couple
of enhancements, and I'd like to sound out the list before jumping in
and coding.


1. I'd quite like the idea of a generic "resource", that users have
access to, rather than just a controller method. The resource could be
or correspond to a file on the server's fs, a wiki page, a diary
appointment, etc.

The resource would have a set of permissions, controlled through the model:
 * See   (whether this resource actually appears at all)
 * Read (Are the contents of the resource visible/executable?)
 * Modify
 * Delete
 * Grant (who can change the permissions for this resource)

The resource also has an owner (user) and a group (role).
Each of the permissions above can be set to one of 'owner', 'group',
'world' or none.

Proposed module name: Catalyst::Plugin::Authorization::ACL::Resource

2. Full blown access control lists

For more sophisticated requirements, we have an actual list:

Include: list of entities
Exclude: list of entities


each entity can be one of the following:
 * A user
 * 'owner'
 * A role
 * 'group'
 * An ACL (i.e. nesting)

This enhances option 1 above by allowing the permission to be an ACL
besides 'owner', 'group', 'world' or none.

Proposed module name: Catalyst::Plugin::Authorization::ACL::Full

What do people think? Feedback please.

By the way in case you are wondering, I am looking to write a CMS that
sits on top of Catalyst.

Ivor.

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk

2008-06-06 Thread Ash Berlin


On 6 Jun 2008, at 14:50, Mitch Jackson wrote:


On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Dan Dascalescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Works as expected. Even after I log out (without running nohup), the
app correctly logs requests to myapp.stderr. I'm writing a tutorial  
on

Catalyst deployment with lighttpd and fastcgi at
http://catwiki.toeat.com/gettingstarted/howtos/deploy/ 
lighttpd_fastcgi

(please feel free to amend) and want to get a good understanding of
this issue.


Your tutorial is informative.  It's nice to see a non-apache
deployment guide.  When deploying under apache, the web server is
easily configured to deliver static content without asking the fastcgi
process to do it.  Is that possible with this lighttpd configuration?

e.g. myapp.com/static gets served directly by lighttpd, while all
other requests go through the catalyst app.

/Mitchell K. Jackson



http://perlitist.com/articles/catalyst-with-lighttpd

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk

2008-06-06 Thread Mitch Jackson
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Dan Dascalescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works as expected. Even after I log out (without running nohup), the
> app correctly logs requests to myapp.stderr. I'm writing a tutorial on
> Catalyst deployment with lighttpd and fastcgi at
> http://catwiki.toeat.com/gettingstarted/howtos/deploy/lighttpd_fastcgi
> (please feel free to amend) and want to get a good understanding of
> this issue.

Your tutorial is informative.  It's nice to see a non-apache
deployment guide.  When deploying under apache, the web server is
easily configured to deliver static content without asking the fastcgi
process to do it.  Is that possible with this lighttpd configuration?

e.g. myapp.com/static gets served directly by lighttpd, while all
other requests go through the catalyst app.

/Mitchell K. Jackson

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


Re: [Catalyst] Re: how many RAM used is normal

2008-06-06 Thread Marcello Romani

Aristotle Pagaltzis ha scritto:

* Fayland Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-06 04:55]:

we are using Catalyst under mod_perl2. and every httpd is
costing 130-200M. `top` shows:


But I expect that much of that memory is shared with other
httpd instances. F.ex. see
http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006/02/understanding-memory-usage-on-linux.html

Regards,


Thanks for mentioning that article, I found it very nice and informative.

--
Marcello Romani
Responsabile IT
Ottotecnica s.r.l.
http://www.ottotecnica.com

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk

2008-06-06 Thread Dan Dascalescu
What is the difference between launching `script/myapp_fastcgi.pl
-daemon` and running `nohup script/myapp_fastcgi.pl &' ?

I want to be able to run fastcgi.pl -l in the background, with
debugging enabled, and log its STDERR. I tried

script/myapp_fastcgi.pl -l 127.0.0.1:55900 -d 2>>myapp.stderr

but only the initial startup screen ended up in myapp.stderr. No debug
information about requests was written to the file.

Running the same application like this:

script/myapp_fastcgi.pl -l 127.0.0.1:55900 2>>myapp.stderr &

Works as expected. Even after I log out (without running nohup), the
app correctly logs requests to myapp.stderr. I'm writing a tutorial on
Catalyst deployment with lighttpd and fastcgi at
http://catwiki.toeat.com/gettingstarted/howtos/deploy/lighttpd_fastcgi
(please feel free to amend) and want to get a good understanding of
this issue.

Thanks,
Dan

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk

2008-06-06 Thread Dan Dascalescu
Forgot to mention: in both cases, I launch myapp_fastcgi.pl with the
`-keeperr` parameter.

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Dan Dascalescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the difference between launching `script/myapp_fastcgi.pl
> -daemon` and running `nohup script/myapp_fastcgi.pl &' ?
>
> I want to be able to run fastcgi.pl -l in the background, with
> debugging enabled, and log its STDERR. I tried
>
> script/myapp_fastcgi.pl -l 127.0.0.1:55900 -d 2>>myapp.stderr
>
> but only the initial startup screen ended up in myapp.stderr. No debug
> information about requests was written to the file.
>
> Running the same application like this:
>
> script/myapp_fastcgi.pl -l 127.0.0.1:55900 2>>myapp.stderr &
>
> Works as expected. Even after I log out (without running nohup), the
> app correctly logs requests to myapp.stderr. I'm writing a tutorial on
> Catalyst deployment with lighttpd and fastcgi at
> http://catwiki.toeat.com/gettingstarted/howtos/deploy/lighttpd_fastcgi
> (please feel free to amend) and want to get a good understanding of
> this issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


Re: [Catalyst] how many RAM used is normal

2008-06-06 Thread Marcello Romani

Fayland Lam ha scritto:
we are using Catalyst under mod_perl2. and every httpd is costing 
130-200M. `top` shows:


1566 apache16   0  147m 136m 6188 S  0.0  1.7   0:23.97 httpd
1567 apache16   0  147m 136m 6200 S  0.0  1.7   0:28.51 httpd
1568 apache16   0  143m 132m 6192 S  0.0  1.6   0:23.45 httpd
1569 apache16   0  144m 133m 6192 S  0.0  1.6   0:24.36 httpd
1570 apache15   0  152m 141m 6196 S  0.0  1.7   0:23.45 httpd
1571 apache16   0  141m 130m 6192 S  0.0  1.6   0:24.57 httpd
1572 apache16   0  143m 131m 6196 S  0.0  1.6   0:22.13 httpd
1581 apache16   0  148m 137m 6184 S  0.0  1.7   0:22.56 httpd
1582 apache16   0  142m 131m 6188 S  0.0  1.6   0:22.12 httpd
1583 apache16   0  144m 133m 6192 S  0.0  1.6   0:21.89 httpd
1584 apache16   0  141m 130m 6184 S  0.0  1.6   0:23.20 httpd
1587 apache16   0  151m 139m 6184 S  0.0  1.7   0:23.87 httpd
1588 apache16   0  140m 129m 6180 S  0.0  1.6   0:21.76 httpd
1589 apache16   0  142m 131m 6188 S  0.0  1.6   0:20.75 httpd
2128 apache16   0  138m 127m 6176 S  0.0  1.6   0:09.76 httpd

is it normal under Catalyst+DBIx::Class+Template? or there is something 
wrong?

What's your Catalyst App costs? Thanks.



I suppose that's a 'top' output; memory columns should be: virtual, 
resident, shared.


memory usage is thus between 120 and 130 MB for each httpd instance
(e.g. 1360MB resident - 6M shared).

For example, on one of my servers I have vmware server running:

 4615 root 5 -10  365m 307m 296m S0 15.2  81:57.93 vmware-vmx
 3905 root 5 -10  381m 304m 291m S2 15.0  85:41.40 vmware-vmx

resident: 307MB, 296 of which are shared among the two processes.

If all those httpd processes run the same app I think they have should 
have more shared memory.

You could probably check if you preload your app in your apache config file.
Something like:


use lib qw(/path/to/MyApp/lib);

PerlModule MyApp;

etc.


HTH

Just my 2 eurocents.


--
Marcello Romani
Responsabile IT
Ottotecnica s.r.l.
http://www.ottotecnica.com

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


[Catalyst] Re: how many RAM used is normal

2008-06-06 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Fayland Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-06 04:55]:
> we are using Catalyst under mod_perl2. and every httpd is
> costing 130-200M. `top` shows:

But I expect that much of that memory is shared with other
httpd instances. F.ex. see
http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006/02/understanding-memory-usage-on-linux.html

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // 

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/