Hi Matt!
> (1) http://www.browsing.co.uk/cat
This is kind of a restyling of the current web site. It's OK, but with
all that information is maybe a bit scary for the newcomer compared to
others. And it has nothing really new compared to current, anyhow.
> (2) http://agaton.scsys.co.uk/~matthewt/
Hahaha. Nice! I didn't see that.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Devin Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like it for the mere fact that in the title it says "Chuck Norris's
> Framework"
>
> :-)
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Kieren Diment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 12 Jun 2008,
(1) http://www.browsing.co.uk/cat
This is the one I would pick, even though it is bland. It looks
like any other current site. But within the current line-up I
would consider that a strength…
I am well aware of this - the top 'tempter' paragraph is way too ugly
and on this monitor makes the t
I like it for the mere fact that in the title it says "Chuck Norris's
Framework"
:-)
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Kieren Diment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12 Jun 2008, at 07:23, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
>
> * Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-11 22:05]:
>>
>>> (1) http://ww
On 12 Jun 2008, at 07:23, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-11 22:05]:
(1) http://www.browsing.co.uk/cat
This is the one I would pick, even though it is bland. It looks
like any other current site. But within the current line-up I
would consider that a st
> Simon Elliott:
>
> (1) http://www.browsing.co.uk/cat
>
> Mark Keating:
>
>
Well, I wonder how this one will really look inside a browser window
that has a lot of installed toolbars? The two rows of links at the top
have a toolbarish feel.
> (2) http://agaton.scsys.co.uk/~matthewt/catsite/cat
* Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-11 23:05]:
> I'd much rather see a footer more like this one:
>
> http://movabletype.org/
++
That’s exactly the kind of “what does the first-time visitor
expect to see/do here?”-driven design (by which I mean the “how
it works” not the “how it lo
I’m going to preface this by saying sorry for being so negative,
as I know how attached people can get to their creative output…
please keep in mind that I am making these comments in the
interest of improving Cat’s marketing. And I have to agree with
Gabriel that none of these would really attract
Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Matt S Trout wrote:
Simon Elliott:
(1) http://www.browsing.co.uk/cat
Overall my favorite. The white text against the bottom of the grey
gradient starts to fade, but I'm sure that's easily fixed. I wouldn't
mind making all the non-tab text a little la
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Matt S Trout wrote:
Simon Elliott:
(1) http://www.browsing.co.uk/cat
Overall my favorite. The white text against the bottom of the grey
gradient starts to fade, but I'm sure that's easily fixed. I wouldn't mind
making all the non-tab text a little larger, but maybe my e
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Matt S Trout wrote:
Simon Elliott:
(1) http://www.browsing.co.uk/cat
Overall my favorite. The white text against the bottom of the grey gradient
starts to fade, but I'm sure that's easily fixed. I wouldn't mind making all
the no
11.06.2008 22:00 Christopher H. Laco:
Mark Keating:
(2) http://agaton.scsys.co.uk/~matthewt/catsite/cat_mock_web_001.png
The Catalyst logo as a crop circle is a very powerful mental
moniker. I love that.
Actually the catalyst logo IS a crop circle. :)
--
sebastian
__
> Simon Elliott:
>
> (1) http://www.browsing.co.uk/cat
Maybe better with a brighter background, a better content
distribution, a brighter background where there is "Choose your own
ingredient", and a more informative bottom. Would be perfect in my
opinion.
>
> Mark Keating:
>
> (2) http://agaton.
None of them attract me Catalyst or to navigate the site. Sorry.
But if would really need to choose one, the #1 would be chosen.
I think the actual design is modern then the options here.
Sorry if I wrote something stupid.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
Ok, here's how this is going to work:
We're going to have one round of feedback, I'll give it a week or two or
until this thread stops getting new posts.
The designs are numbered so we have a simple way to refer to them; I've
presented them in alphabetical order by creator s
On Jun 11, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
Ok, here's how this is going to work:
We're going to have one round of feedback, I'll give it a week or
two or
until this thread stops getting new posts.
The designs are numbered so we have a simple way to refer to them;
I've
presented th
Here are the designs I've been given:
Simon Elliott:
(1) http://www.browsing.co.uk/cat
The big white tab annoys me. :-)
Mark Keating:
(2) http://agaton.scsys.co.uk/~matthewt/catsite/cat_mock_web_001.png
The Catalyst logo as a crop circle is a very powerful mental moniker. I
love that.
Ok, here's how this is going to work:
We're going to have one round of feedback, I'll give it a week or two or
until this thread stops getting new posts.
The designs are numbered so we have a simple way to refer to them; I've
presented them in alphabetical order by creator surname.
Feedback shou
Jonathan, thank you for a most thought provoking reply. I couldn't work
out whether you were playing devil's advocate, or if you completely
believe that my generic approach is doomed to failure.
I may get it wrong, but I will learn from the experience. There is no
failure, only feedback. Saying "I
I have had similar problems using DBIC directly when running the dev server.
I don't know why that happens, but maybe the perl HTTP server does not clean
up everything it should after each request, or something (something, [...])
It runs on FastCGI with no problems at all (10 or 20 procs, don't
20 matches
Mail list logo
