Re: [Catalyst] Re: Private Chained Actions?

2008-06-22 Thread Jonathan Rockway
* On Fri, Jun 20 2008, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: * Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-20 22:20]: Yeah, that's ugly. What you really want are method modifiers: package MyApp::Controller::Foo; use Moose; BEGIN { extends 'Catalyst::Controller' }; sub

Re: [Catalyst] Running java inside Catalyst

2008-06-22 Thread Lindolfo Lorn Rodrigues
system function it's a bad idea, if you really need to run Java inside Perl, i did not try that inside Catalyst, you can check Inline::Java http://search.cpan.org/~patl/Inline-Java-0.52/Java.pod I think that will not a problem to use Inline::* inside Catalyst. Good Luck, and tell us your

[Catalyst] test, please ignore

2008-06-22 Thread Octavian Rasnita
test ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Private Chained Actions?

2008-06-22 Thread Ash Berlin
On 22 Jun 2008, at 18:56, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: * Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-22 15:35]: * On Fri, Jun 20 2008, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: That’s even uglier. Imagine there isn’t just `hello` but half a dozen other methods all sharing the same setup. So the setup code is

Re: [Catalyst] Running java inside Catalyst

2008-06-22 Thread Jonathan Rockway
* On Sun, Jun 22 2008, Lindolfo \Lorn\ Rodrigues wrote: system function it's a bad idea, if you really need to run Java inside Perl, i did not try that inside Catalyst, you can check Inline::Java http:// search.cpan.org/~patl/Inline-Java-0.52/Java.pod I think that will not a problem to use

Re: [Catalyst] Running java inside Catalyst

2008-06-22 Thread Lindolfo Lorn Rodrigues
No, i didn't know, i looked at the source and it's true :( at least Inline::Java it's better than a simple system(java ... ) ? On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * On Sun, Jun 22 2008, Lindolfo \Lorn\ Rodrigues wrote: system function it's a bad idea,

Re: [Catalyst] Running java inside Catalyst

2008-06-22 Thread Mark Trostler
You can use Java.pm there are no system calls... Mark Lindolfo Lorn Rodrigues wrote: No, i didn't know, i looked at the source and it's true :( at least Inline::Java it's better than a simple system(java ... ) ? On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Catalyst] Running java inside Catalyst

2008-06-22 Thread Robert Krimen
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 6:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Just curious, yesterday I was playing with Java inside Catalyst, and I put a code like: system(java); in one of my controllers, and when I accessed the URL, the whole computer: Fedora Core 8, froze and I had to restart. I am

Re: [Catalyst] Running java inside Catalyst

2008-06-22 Thread sindharta_tanuwijaya
Hi, Not sure which specific engine you asked, but I'll just put all of them. --- java version 1.6.0_06 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_06-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 10.0-b22, mixed mode) Linux version 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20070925