Re: [Catalyst] fcgid

2008-09-29 Thread John Lee
Matt S Trout wrote: fcgid is designed for shared hosting. it's basically useless for dedicated setups. I ask this, because it seems that it works better than fastcgi, it is maintained and prefered, but I can't see why. mod_fastcgi is maintained, just minimally and quietly, and it works

Re: [Catalyst] fcgid

2008-09-29 Thread Peter Karman
John Lee wrote on 09/29/2008 08:46 AM: What's the general concensus in the catalyst community nowadays? Is mod_fastcgi preferred at large over mod_fcgid these days? I saw a post I use mod_fastcgi. It has the external server option, which I like because I can stop/start my app without having

Re: [Catalyst] DBIx::Class and Catalyst - Trying to make sense of it all.

2008-09-29 Thread Matt S Trout
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:15:25AM -0400, Leanan Sidhe wrote: First, I apologize for the completely noob tone of this email. I've read through the perl docs for DBIx::Class, and various Catalyst parts, but I'm having problems understanding how DBIx::Class stuff is slightly different in

Re: [Catalyst] minor typo in Catalyst::Authentication::Store::DBIx::Class::User

2008-09-29 Thread Jason Kuri
Hi John, Thanks for catching that. I've incorporated the fix and pushed a new version. It should be on CPAN soon. Thanks again, Jay On Sep 28, 2008, at 9:08 AM, John Romkey wrote: On Sep 28, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Matt S Trout wrote: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:17:05AM -0400, John Romkey

[Catalyst] Re: fcgid

2008-09-29 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-29 16:05]: What's the general concensus in the catalyst community nowadays? Is mod_fastcgi preferred at large over mod_fcgid these days? Personally? ::Engine::HTTP::Prefork + ::Plugin::Static::Simple. Then I put a reverse proxy in front (it doesn’t really