Re: [Catalyst] OT Apache question

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Jesse Sheidlower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 02:40:26PM +1100, Kieren Diment wrote: >> >> On 28/11/2008, at 2:30 PM, Jesse Sheidlower wrote: >>> >>> Is it worth putting this into the C::P::Static::Simple docs, >> >> >> Yes, that would be the

Re: [Catalyst] Re: OT: Use the CPAN, Luke?

On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Johan Lindstr?m wrote: At 06:58 2008-11-27, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > According to the Mouse docs, Mouse supports the most commonly > used features of Moose, but runs in 25% of the time. I'm happy I think that may be referring to startup time (and the Mouse POD refers

Re: [Catalyst] OT Apache question

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 02:40:26PM +1100, Kieren Diment wrote: > > On 28/11/2008, at 2:30 PM, Jesse Sheidlower wrote: >> >> Is it worth putting this into the C::P::Static::Simple docs, > > > Yes, that would be the right place for it. Done, but > A recipe for lighttpd would be good too. Since I'

Re: [Catalyst] OT Apache question

On 28/11/2008, at 2:30 PM, Jesse Sheidlower wrote: Is it worth putting this into the C::P::Static::Simple docs, Yes, that would be the right place for it. A recipe for lighttpd would be good too. or other places where we talk about Apache configs? I will quite obviously volunteer for t

Re: [Catalyst] OT Apache question

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 07:10:20PM -0800, J. Shirley wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Jesse Sheidlower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Details of unbelievably n00bish Apache config question] > > this obviously won't work because /Incomings/static isn't in > > fact under my document root, it'

Re: [Catalyst] OT Apache question

On Thursday 27 November 2008 08:45:16 pm Jesse Sheidlower wrote: > > However my document root is at /usr/local/www/data, which > obviously does not include /usr/local/www/modules. So, if I > try to follow the Static::Simple suggestion of adding, say, > > > SetHandler default-handler > > > t

Re: [Catalyst] OT Apache question

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Jesse Sheidlower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A few weeks ago I asked a series of questions about caching, > at the end of which discussion it was suggested that I use > Apache, instead of Cat with the Static::Simple plugin, to > serve my static files. I had tried

Re: [Catalyst] OT Apache question

Jesse Sheidlower wrote: A few weeks ago I asked a series of questions about caching, at the end of which discussion it was suggested that I use Apache, instead of Cat with the Static::Simple plugin, to serve my static files. I had tried this once before and ran into problems and given up, so, the

[Catalyst] OT Apache question

A few weeks ago I asked a series of questions about caching, at the end of which discussion it was suggested that I use Apache, instead of Cat with the Static::Simple plugin, to serve my static files. I had tried this once before and ran into problems and given up, so, the question: I'd prefer to

Re: [Catalyst] Re: OT: Use the CPAN, Luke?

At 06:58 2008-11-27, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > According to the Mouse docs, Mouse supports the most commonly > used features of Moose, but runs in 25% of the time. I'm happy I think that may be referring to startup time (and the Mouse POD refers to compile time actually). In the context

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch

Toby Corkindale wrote: Hi guys, I'm having trouble getting Catalyst to install (via CPAN) on a fresh Debian Etch install. The problem is the dependency Mouse (0.11) fails its unit tests there. (I'd guess due to the older versions of some core packages). I've raised http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Di

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch

Simon Elliott wrote: Hey toby... http://search.cpan.org/src/MRAMBERG/Catalyst-Action-RenderView-0.08/Makefile.PL - I'm pretty sure RenderView does not depend on Mouse. is does however depend on Data::Visitor which uses Squirrel, so installing Moose should solve this. Squirrel is bundled i

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch

Marcus Ramberg wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Toby Corkindale <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Hi guys, I'm having trouble getting Catalyst to install (via CPAN) on a fresh Debian Etch install. The problem is the dependency Mouse (0.11) fails its u

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::SOAP "no operation `index' for portType" error

I've been playing with this recently. What have you actually defined your endpoint to be in the WSDL? ... * http://example.com/service"/>* I think the example in the synopsis shows you how to set up an endpoint for: /service/index Which th

[Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::SOAP "no operation `index' for portType" error

Hi, I have a SOAP controller based on WSDL. Maybe I confused something but I understood that I need to add # this is the endpoint from where the RPC operations will be # dispatched. This code won't be executed at all. # See Catalyst::Controller::SOAP::RPC. sub index :Local SOAP(

Re: [Catalyst] PDF upload problems (prob OT)?

--- On Thu, 11/27/08, Tomas Doran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Tomas Doran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Catalyst] PDF upload problems (prob OT)? > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: "The elegant MVC web framework" , [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > Date: Thursday, November 27, 2008, 5:13 AM > On 27 N

Re: [Catalyst] PDF upload problems (prob OT)?

On 27 Nov 2008, at 12:51, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: I have added this debug code, and discovered that for this file it is always 9 bytes. Thats what it is in the filesystem before i upload it, thats what it is when Cat reports it as T0m suggest i do above, and thats what it is when C

Re: [Catalyst] PDF upload problems (prob OT)?

Hi. Following up here after some time on another project. --- On Fri, 11/7/08, Joel Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Joel Bernstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Catalyst] PDF upload problems (prob OT)? > To: "The elegant MVC web framework" > Date: Friday, November 7, 2008, 5:

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch

On 27 Nov 2008, at 11:40, Simon Elliott wrote: Hey toby... http://search.cpan.org/src/MRAMBERG/Catalyst-Action- RenderView-0.08/Makefile.PL - I'm pretty sure RenderView does not depend on Mouse. is does however depend on Data::Visitor which uses Squirrel, so installing Moose should sol

Re: [Catalyst] Re: OT: Use the CPAN, Luke?

> > Maybe there should be a list of modules that should be preferred > for certain purposes when writing Catalyst extensions? Of course > we don't to *prescribe* any of them, since the main selling point > of Catalyst is that cares more about being glue and about having > an opinion. So if you want

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch

Hey toby... http://search.cpan.org/src/MRAMBERG/Catalyst-Action-RenderView-0.08/Makefile.PL - I'm pretty sure RenderView does not depend on Mouse. is does however depend on Data::Visitor which uses Squirrel, so installing Moose should solve this. Simon ___

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Toby Corkindale < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > I'm having trouble getting Catalyst to install (via CPAN) on a fresh Debian > Etch install. > The problem is the dependency Mouse (0.11) fails its unit tests there. > (I'd guess due to the older versions of s

Re: [Catalyst] FormValidator and FV_eq_with constraint method

Answering my own question again. It appears that you have to add all fields to either the required or optional array in order that Data::FormValidator processes them correctly. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FormValidator-and-FV_eq_with-constraint-method-tp20703984p207157

Re: [Catalyst] OT: Use the CPAN, Luke? (was: Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch)

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Toby Corkindale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-27 01:55]: >> The problem is the dependency Mouse (0.11) fails its unit tests >> there. > > That's really the sole solid argument against a flamboyant > use-the-CPAN atti