Re: [Catalyst] OT: Use the CPAN, Luke?

2008-11-30 Thread J. Shirley
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [> * On Sun, Nov 30 2008, Toby Corkindale wrote: >> If the automated install fails, people are likely to say "bah, this >> Perl thing sucks, let's go for that similar app written in >> PHP/Java/Ruby instead - at least it's

Re: [Catalyst] OT: Use the CPAN, Luke?

2008-11-30 Thread Toby Corkindale
Jonathan Rockway wrote: * On Sun, Nov 30 2008, Toby Corkindale wrote: If the automated install fails, people are likely to say "bah, this Perl thing sucks, let's go for that similar app written in PHP/Java/Ruby instead - at least it's simple to install!" Why do you care about what other people

Re: [Catalyst] OT: Use the CPAN, Luke?

2008-11-30 Thread Jonathan Rockway
* On Sun, Nov 30 2008, Toby Corkindale wrote: > If the automated install fails, people are likely to say "bah, this > Perl thing sucks, let's go for that similar app written in > PHP/Java/Ruby instead - at least it's simple to install!" Why do you care about what other people do? If these people

Re: [Catalyst] OT: Use the CPAN, Luke?

2008-11-30 Thread Toby Corkindale
Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 03:55:54AM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: Case in point, Mouse is essentially Moose Light. Since Catalyst itself is becoming Moose-based, is there *any* reason to use Mouse instead? I suppose if it automatically stubs itself into a Moose lo

[Catalyst] Re: OT: Use the CPAN, Luke? (was: Catalyst install failure due to Mouse.pm on Debian Etch)

2008-11-30 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-28 10:20]: > While Data::Visitor depends on Mouse, it actually uses Squirrel > (which is in the Mouse dist), which will fall back to the Moose > already loaded by Catalyst. I assume most Mouse-users are smart > enough to do this. Yeah, that’s