On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[> * On Sun, Nov 30 2008, Toby Corkindale wrote:
>> If the automated install fails, people are likely to say "bah, this
>> Perl thing sucks, let's go for that similar app written in
>> PHP/Java/Ruby instead - at least it's
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
* On Sun, Nov 30 2008, Toby Corkindale wrote:
If the automated install fails, people are likely to say "bah, this
Perl thing sucks, let's go for that similar app written in
PHP/Java/Ruby instead - at least it's simple to install!"
Why do you care about what other people
* On Sun, Nov 30 2008, Toby Corkindale wrote:
> If the automated install fails, people are likely to say "bah, this
> Perl thing sucks, let's go for that similar app written in
> PHP/Java/Ruby instead - at least it's simple to install!"
Why do you care about what other people do? If these people
Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 03:55:54AM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
Case in point, Mouse is essentially Moose Light. Since Catalyst
itself is becoming Moose-based, is there *any* reason to use
Mouse instead? I suppose if it automatically stubs itself into
a Moose lo
* Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-28 10:20]:
> While Data::Visitor depends on Mouse, it actually uses Squirrel
> (which is in the Mouse dist), which will fall back to the Moose
> already loaded by Catalyst. I assume most Mouse-users are smart
> enough to do this.
Yeah, thatâs
