On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:25:15PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
I have a module that uses IO::Pipe and when I run it under the
Catalyst server the pipe doesn't work (see below).
Please try to reproduce with Catalyst-Runtime-5.8000_06. It has a fix
related to spawning external processes from the
2009/2/5 Florian Ragwitz r...@debian.org
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:25:15PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
I have a module that uses IO::Pipe and when I run it under the
Catalyst server the pipe doesn't work (see below).
Please try to reproduce with Catalyst-Runtime-5.8000_06. It has a fix
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:51:18PM +, Peter Edwards wrote:
Was that the change to the catching of signal SIGCHLD ?
Exactly.
--
BOFH excuse #66:
bit bucket overflow
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
List:
Hi all,
I just got a request for an Catalyst article that will be published in a
special edition of the iX magazine. I wont have time myself so I thought
maybe here might be some folks from Germany interested in taking up the
offer to promote Catalyst and earn a few bucks. I've written an article
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:23:03PM +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:25:15PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
I have a module that uses IO::Pipe and when I run it under the
Catalyst server the pipe doesn't work (see below).
Please try to reproduce with
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:10:07AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
Same problem.
Would you mind preparing a testcase for this?
TestApp::Controller::Fork / t/live_fork.t already has similar tests. You
can run them against the dev server using t/optional_http-server.t.
--
BOFH excuse #86:
Runt
Bill Moseley wrote on 02/05/2009 09:10 AM:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:23:03PM +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:25:15PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
I have a module that uses IO::Pipe and when I run it under the
Catalyst server the pipe doesn't work (see below).
Please
В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
the first byte.
I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some changes to
my .htaccess to serve the static directly from the webserver and now it
loads for 5
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Anton Katsarov t...@katsarov.org wrote:
В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
the first byte.
I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some changes to
my
2009/2/5 J. Shirley jshir...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Anton Katsarov t...@katsarov.org wrote:
В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
the first byte.
I do agree. But that is because of the
В 08:30 -0800 на 05.02.2009 (чт), J. Shirley написа:
If 5 seconds works for you, cool.
Just as a benchmark, all my apps send full HTML in under .8 seconds
(or I tune them until they do). It's relatively easy to get FCGI
support and a lot of cheap hosts provide it.
I don't want to argue,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Anton Katsarov wrote:
В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
the first byte.
I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some changes to
my .htaccess
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Anton Katsarov t...@katsarov.org wrote:
В 08:30 -0800 на 05.02.2009 (чт), J. Shirley написа:
If 5 seconds works for you, cool.
Just as a benchmark, all my apps send full HTML in under .8 seconds
(or I tune them until they do). It's relatively easy to get FCGI
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:28:57PM +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:10:07AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
Same problem.
Would you mind preparing a testcase for this?
I can try. See attached diff against svn 9215.
$ prove -vl t/live_fork.t
t/live_fork
1..15
My installation of Fedora 10 x86_64 is using Fedora-packaged Perl
(perl-5.10.0-53.fc10.x86_64) and the perl-Catalyst-Runtime
(perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.7015-1.fc10.noarch) and it doesn't seem to be
maintained; there is no 5.71000 release as an RPM package. I have read
the thread from last summer
Is a new Catalyst book being written? I have the original Rockway book,
my interest is in a new work-in-progress book.
If so, is there an early-access electronic version available?
Thanks
Bob Cochran
Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
___
List:
Hi J Shirley
I'm trying to install your neat C::V::Email package but I'm running into some
test failures. I thought you might like to know about them. The test failures
look benign to me so I'm going to force install, but let me know if you think
that the errors could be dangerous.
Let me
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Byron Young byron.yo...@riverbed.com wrote:
Hi J Shirley
I'm trying to install your neat C::V::Email package but I'm running into some
test failures. I thought you might like to know about them. The test
failures look benign to me so I'm going to force
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Robert L Cochran
cochr...@speakeasy.net wrote:
Dangerous? Well I don't think this module runs around with a Uzi
spraying everyone.
I don't think it is a good practice to force an install on errors. You
should always get to the bottom of why the errors are
The next book will be published by Apress and we're producing the
first draft at the moment. It should be out in time for OSCON in june.
Kieren
On 06/02/2009, at 6:03 AM, Robert L Cochran wrote:
Is a new Catalyst book being written? I have the original Rockway
book,
my interest is in a
J. Shirley wrote on 2009-02-05:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Robert L Cochran
cochr...@speakeasy.net wrote:
Dangerous? Well I don't think this module runs around with a Uzi
spraying everyone.
I don't think it is a good practice to force an install on errors. You
should always get to
On 06/02/2009, at 9:14 AM, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jason Gottshall wrote:
Just out of curiosity, who is authoring it?
It looks like the book is already listed on apress.com:
http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430223650
Oh shit, that means we've actually got to finish
You can at least be
assured that I'll buy the book...
Bob
Kieren Diment wrote:
On 06/02/2009, at 9:14 AM, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jason Gottshall wrote:
Just out of curiosity, who is authoring it?
It looks like the book is already
On Feb 5, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Kieren Diment wrote:
On 06/02/2009, at 9:14 AM, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jason Gottshall wrote:
Just out of curiosity, who is authoring it?
It looks like the book is already listed on apress.com:
http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430223650
Oh
24 matches
Mail list logo
