Excellent... I had this exact problem yesterday, and thought I would
have to battle through modules tracking down the source of the
problem... but totally randomly I read this posting in the list and it
fixed my problem..
thanks very much :)
Devin Austin wrote:
Charlie Garrison wrote:
What's the best way to achieve this? I tried $c-authenticate without a
password, but this doesn't seem to work.
--
I use 2 different authentication realms, ldap (normal login) and none
(single-signon, surrogate) and my login controller decides which one to use,
so that root can
I have two questions about CX::SimpleLogin:
1. Is there a simple way to change the settings for
redirect_after_login_uri and redirect_after_logout_uri ?
2. Why is the redirect code outsourced into a role
(CX:S::TraitFor::Controller::Login::WithRedirect) when
Hello!
Maybe someone can provide the community with complete example of
users/roles editor with HTML::FormFu::DBIx::Class::Model?
Manual drops to foo:bar explaination too often (
Alex.
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo:
Hi all,
This is probably going to end up being nothing to do with catalyst but
as this is where I am seeing the problem its where im starting.
I have a standalone set of objects that work as expected. When I wrap
these with Catalyst::Model::Adaptor for use as a model they fail with
the
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:33 AM, J. Shirley jshir...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm all for reusable code, but in no way should HTTP::Body start
taking this behavior by default. I'm not really that sure how
effective it is, anyway.
No, I was not suggesting that would be the default (although I'm
From: Alex Povolotsky tark...@over.ru
Hello!
Maybe someone can provide the community with complete example of
users/roles editor with HTML::FormFu::DBIx::Class::Model?
Are you sure this module exists?
Octavian
___
List:
2010/1/27 Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com:
From: Alex Povolotsky tark...@over.ru
Hello!
Maybe someone can provide the community with complete example of
users/roles editor with HTML::FormFu::DBIx::Class::Model?
Are you sure this module exists?
Yes, it does exist, just under a
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:33 AM, J. Shirley jshir...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm all for reusable code, but in no way should HTTP::Body start
taking this behavior by default. I'm not really that sure how
effective it is,
Hi again all,
There were some more fixes taken care of in this release. I have
provided a tarball of this release before releasing it on CPAN. Please
check it out here: http://dhoss.net/Catalyst-View-Email-0.21.tar.gz,
test and let the list/channel (#catalyst) know if you have any issues.
Hi all,
sorry to spam the list yet again, but I have released a development
version of Catalyst::View::Email for testing and convenience. You know
what to do.
dhoss
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo:
On 20 Jan 2010, at 09:40, Carl Johnstone wrote:
Tomohiro Hosaka wrote:
Is this correct result?
Yes, the previous situation was a bug. Given
sub foo : Args(1) {
my ($c, $arg) = @_;
};
The URL http://127.0.0.1/foo/bar%2Fbaz would match and set $arg to
'bar/baz'
correctly. However
On 27 Jan 2010, at 15:33, Bill Moseley wrote:
No big deal. I was just curious why the HTTP::Body approach was not
used in the existing REST/RPC modules, as that was already the place
used by Catalyst to de-serialize the body. I thought maybe there
was a reason I might not understood,
On 27 Jan 2010, at 12:06, Bernhard Graf wrote:
I have two questions about CX::SimpleLogin:
1. Is there a simple way to change the settings for
redirect_after_login_uri and redirect_after_logout_uri ?
The 'redirect_after_logout_uri' is just a method, so you can write a
method yourself to
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 27 Jan 2010, at 15:33, Bill Moseley wrote:
No big deal. I was just curious why the HTTP::Body approach was not used
in the existing REST/RPC modules, as that was already the place used by
Catalyst to de-serialize
On 28 Jan 2010, at 00:14, Bill Moseley wrote:
Or that an application might want the raw json?
Or that one app depends on JSON::XS doing the decoding whilst one
depends on JSON.pm..
Cheers
t0m
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo:
Excerpts from Bill Moseley's message of Wed Jan 27 19:14:29 -0500 2010:
I see. So you are saying that Content-Type: application/json might need to
be deserialized differently in different applications that share the same
interpreter? Obviously, json could decode into an array ref so that
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote:
I see. So you are saying that Content-Type: application/json might need to
be deserialized differently in different applications that share the same
interpreter? Obviously, json could decode into an array ref so that could
any help? is this the correct behavior?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:13 PM, xenoterrac...@gmail.com
xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote:
I added a default action to my user controller. When I access /user/ a
chained action is supposed to run, and it ran just fine until i added the
default action. Now
19 matches
Mail list logo
