Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst-Plugin-Params-Nested rt 59604

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Evan Carroll m...@evancarroll.com wrote: Is C:P:P:N still maintained? I filed a bug on CPAN, next day I heard a request for a patch. I provided a patch, and I haven't heard anything back. If any one is maintaining it? Can I get co-maint to apply my patch.

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst-Plugin-Params-Nested rt 59604

You also could look at Catalyst::TraitFor::Request::Params::Hashed 2010/7/28 David Schmidt davew...@gmx.at: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Evan Carroll m...@evancarroll.com wrote: Is C:P:P:N still maintained? I filed a bug on CPAN, next day I heard a request for a patch. I provided a patch,

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst-Plugin-Params-Nested rt 59604

On 28 Jul 2010, at 00:40, Evan Carroll wrote: Find more information about the issue and the patch set here: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=59604 Applied, released, resolved. Thanks for the patch! Cheers t0m ___ List:

[Catalyst] [ANNOUNCE] Catalyst-Runtime 5.80025

Hi It gives me great pleasure to announce the latest maintenance release of the Catalyst 5.80 series. This release fixes some bugs (notably an issue if your application is using 'rails like routes' with the dispatch configured from config) and adds a small refactoring to allow the

[Catalyst] C::P::Unicode::Encoding and C::P::Compress

Hi, I have been using Catalyst::Plugin::Unicode but I read in its POD that Catalyst::Plugin::Unicode::Encoding is now recommended. Can C::P::Unicode::Encoding be used with C::P::Compress::Gzip or C::P::Compress? I've seen that the HTTP headers seem to be correctly generated, but no page