Hi Tomas,
From: Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net
On 13 Aug 2010, at 12:11, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
I have a Catalyst application that occupies 180 MB of RAM if it uses the
internal development server. It occupies more than 1 GB of RAM if it
uses Apache/mod_perl.
I don't believe that. But
Hi,
I have a module that creates an object (a menu) and I want to store it in the
stash when the application starts.
Where is the recommended place to create this object and store it in the stash
if I want that object created just once at app startup?
Should I override a certain method in
Good evening,
On 16/08/10 at 11:05 AM +0300, Octavian Rasnita
orasn...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a module that creates an object (a menu) and I want to
store it in the stash when the application starts.
Where is the recommended place to create this object and store
it in the stash if I want
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Gabriel Vieira
gabriel.vie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing Catalyst::Authentication::Store::MongoDB.
It seems working just fine once it does the authentication right, but
I'm not getting a session done.
Can anyone help me with that?
2010/8/16 Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have a module that creates an object (a menu) and I want to store it in
the stash when the application starts.
Where is the recommended place to create this object and store it in the
stash if I want that object created just once at app
On 08/16/2010 09:32 PM, J. Shirley wrote:
2010/8/16 Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have a module that creates an object (a menu) and I want to store it in
the stash when the application starts.
Where is the recommended place to create this object and store it in the
stash if I
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Curtis Jewell p...@csjewell.fastmail.uswrote:
So the build process can't symlink without checking for support for it
first. (Catalyst DOES run on Win32, after all, as well as the Unixen.)
Of course.
Here's an svn export of an app:
$ find . | wc -l
35677
$
Oh, that patch will break when used on an existing tree, so don't use. And
I'm not clear how distclean will work with the symlinks.
So, if destination is already a symlink is there anything to do? Assume
it's already linked.
And if it's a regular dir then do the rcopy?
I'm using this just to
