On 30/11/10 03:34, Eric Berg wrote:
I see that there are a number of form validation libraries that purport
to work with Catalyst. I've been using CGI::Formbuilder for years and
have been relatively happy with it.
I need something for my new Catalyst app. I have already created my
forms in my
another great module which from my perception is used the most lately is
HTML::FormHandler
http://search.cpan.org/~gshank/HTML-FormHandler-0.32005/
greetings
david
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Mike Raynham
catal...@mikeraynham.co.uk wrote:
On 30/11/10 03:34, Eric Berg wrote:
I see that
formhandler and formbuilder have some syntax similarities. shouldnt be hard
to move from one to the other.
Just in case you are curiousm, here are some examples:
FormBuilder: http://www.formbuilder.org/tutor/index.pl?c=1s=5
FormHandler:
HTML::FormHandler
Chiming in: FormHandler has been getting the most questions lately,
IIRC, but I suspect FormFu is more often used. It has its own
excellent mailing list (made excellent by the main dev, Carl Franks,
who is very responsive and helpful) so the questions don't tend to end
up here.
will trillich wrote on 11/29/2010 05:37 PM:
Aha! It looks like a sneaky, evil, wrong, mean, horrid way to
switch-user in the middle of a session is to
$c-session-{__user}{id} = $new_id_here; # since id = PK
But that's undoubtedly bad form of the worst kind.
What's the canonical
Eric Berg wrote on 11/29/2010 09:34 PM:
You guys got any recommendations?
Rose::HTML::Objects
--
Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . pe...@peknet.com
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo:
Hello,
Currently I run several Catalyst apps under lighttpd using fastcgi.
I'd like to switch to them being HTTP::Prefork.
Are there any sample setups that I can refer to - especially that illustrate:
* several apps on one IP address (hostname based routing)
* restarting app when new code is
Indeed, i think it should login as a new user not changing the actual
session.
maybe something like:
admin clicks login as joeuseropen a new browser window as adminverify
its admin and re-login as a new user. register on session user is admin so
he can log back in.
Then add button terminate
Anybody else *dissing* FormHandler? We've started developing based on
FormHandler lately and haven't had troubles... yet?
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
I can recommend *against* HTML-FormHandler.
For my day job's Perl and Catalyst project, we
My guess is that FormHandler is getting the attention that it is is due
to two major things. First of all, it is Moose based - like Catalyst.
Secondly, the documentation of FormHandler seems more complete. Unless
the docs for FormFu have been updated recently (past 6 months or so),
the
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Edmund von der Burg
e...@ecclestoad.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
Currently I run several Catalyst apps under lighttpd using fastcgi.
I'd like to switch to them being HTTP::Prefork.
A very incomplete answer but I'd suggest adding PSGI/Starman to the
list of things you
Formhandler works like a charm, does many useful checks and you wont have
any trouble with it. i have been using it for a while without any problem.
As for the memory leaks, it can affect you when resources are limited or
when you are running out of ram. (no idea if there are any leaks on
Hi,
I am new to Catalyst and DBIx::Class, trying to use many_to_many
relationship.
I have 3 tables, users, user_groups, and group, table structure and
relationship are setup as follows.
User.pm
__PACKAGE__-add_columns(
id,
{ data_type = integer, is_nullable = 0 },
username,
{ data_type
I recommend you create a 'Example::Schema::ResultSet::Group' resultset
class. Presumably
you already have a 'Result' directory where your table classes reside,
so create a ResultSet
directory (if you don't already have one).
Look here:
On 11/30/2010 10:34 AM, will trillich wrote:
Anybody else *dissing* FormHandler? We've started developing based on
FormHandler lately and haven't had troubles... yet?
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
mailto:shlo...@iglu.org.il wrote:
I can recommend
Le 30 nov. 2010 à 17:02, linuxsupport a écrit :
Hi,
I am new to Catalyst and DBIx::Class, trying to use many_to_many
relationship.
I have 3 tables, users, user_groups, and group, table structure and
relationship are setup as follows.
User.pm
__PACKAGE__-add_columns(
id,
{ data_type =
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Sir Robert Burbridge
rburb...@cisco.com wrote:
To mitigate the awkwardness I felt
about the API, use a pure-module approach (every form is a separate
package/module, that inherits from a base form that's all rigged up the way
I want it, along with a few really
Thanks Emmanuel, worked as I wanted to, much appreciated.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Emmanuel OTTON ot...@mines-albi.frwrote:
Le 30 nov. 2010 à 17:02, linuxsupport a écrit :
Hi,
I am new to Catalyst and DBIx::Class, trying to use many_to_many
relationship.
I have 3 tables,
In the classes you have written, you are using the same name for the
many_to_many method from (group) in User.pm as you have used in method
between UserGroup to Group.
__PACKAGE__-many_to_many(group = 'usergroups', 'group');
I have seen this cause problems in my hands when using it for User
Worked like a charm. I agree that this is a cleaner way as well. However it
might be useful if we had the ability to override added to catalyst something
like
$c-stash
(
WRAPPER = undef,
template = 'src/mypage.tt2',
);
Or something along those lines.
Thanks,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Sam Kaufman samuel.c.kauf...@gmail.comwrote:
I've found the easiest way is to have some logic in your wrapper:
something like this:
[%
IF no_wrapper;
content;
ELSE;
content WRAPPER site/html + site/layout;
END;
%]
I tend to use a CASE statement in
On 1 Dec 2010, at 00:39, Bill Moseley wrote:
Yes, but I also allow templates to specify their layout. So for an action
/foo/bar I might have /foo/bar.tt and in bar.tt:
[% page.layout = 'cms'; # override default layout %]
Yes, that's what I do. The template is deciding the view. IMO
22 matches
Mail list logo
