[Catalyst] What are these files?

2011-03-16 Thread John M. Dlugosz
When I generate a makefile, I also get directories called inc and blib. What are those for? They are not used by the app. ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive:

Re: [Catalyst] What are these files?

2011-03-16 Thread Kieren Diment
They're used by the build system, and are safe to remove / put in .gitignore etc On 16/03/2011, at 4:59 PM, John M. Dlugosz wrote: When I generate a makefile, I also get directories called inc and blib. What are those for? They are not used by the app.

[Catalyst] Basic help with deployment

2011-03-16 Thread John M. Dlugosz
I'm going through the Packt Publishing book, and I can't help but wonder first of all why I had to return to it, instead of finding this in the online documentation? I find tips on configuring fastcgi, but it completely leaves out all mention of the makefile and the available options! I did

Re: [Catalyst] Escaping of argument of private path

2011-03-16 Thread Octavian Rasnita
From: John M. Dlugosz wxju46g...@snkmail.com On 3/15/2011 4:56 AM, Octavian Rasnita orasnita-at-gmail.com |Catalyst/Allow to home| wrote: uri_for() escapes only the chars which are not in the following list (from URI.pm): $reserved = q(;/?:@=+$,[]); $mark = q(-_.!~*'());

Re: [Catalyst] Escaping of argument of private path

2011-03-16 Thread John M. Dlugosz
On 3/16/2011 2:02 AM, Octavian Rasnita orasnita-at-gmail.com |Catalyst/Allow to home| wrote: Why would you like to need to escape every path component by using the TT uri filter for more times and escape the reserved chars even where they can be used as they are, instead of using the html

Re: [Catalyst] Basic help with deployment

2011-03-16 Thread Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯
online documentation […] completely leaves out all mention of the makefile and the available options! Because the build system/toolchain is not specific to Catalyst, as a CPAN author (or at least someone who authors distributions according to the principles) you are already supposed to know

Re: [Catalyst] Basic help with deployment

2011-03-16 Thread will trillich
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 da...@cpan.org wrote: I found that I need to run cpan -i Module as root This is not a good idea. Instead configure the cpan options `make_install_make_command` and `mbuild_install_build_command` to employ sudo.

Re: [Catalyst] Basic help with deployment

2011-03-16 Thread Nicholas Wehr
a local::lib alternative is Shipwright; created by Best Practical the makers of RT defect tracker On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:15 AM, will trillich will.trill...@serensoft.comwrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 da...@cpan.org wrote: I found that I need to run cpan -i

Re: [Catalyst] Basic help with deployment

2011-03-16 Thread John M. Dlugosz
On 3/16/2011 8:15 AM, will trillich will.trillich-at-serensoft.com |Catalyst/Allow to home| wrote: Probably you've already run this as root (or via sudo) and paths have been created with root ownership. Your normal user isn't allowed to frob those. Under Debian Squeeze, it appears that the

Re: [Catalyst] Basic help with deployment

2011-03-16 Thread John M. Dlugosz
On 3/16/2011 4:21 AM, Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 daxim-at-cpan.org |Catalyst/Allow to home| wrote: This is not a good idea. Instead configure the cpan options `make_install_make_command` and `mbuild_install_build_command` to employ sudo. http://p3rl.org/CPAN#Config_Variables Just inserting sudo in