Re: [Catalyst] May be asynchronous communication between Catalyst applications

2013-03-04 Thread Larry Leszczynski
Hi - On Sun, Mar 3, 2013, at 08:44 PM, linuxsupport wrote: I tried Catalyst::Plugin::RunAfterRequest, when I send request to the app, it returns fine but it does not accept any other request after that until that sub routine finishes. By default the test server runs a single process, so that

Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

2013-03-04 Thread John Napiorkowski
Bill, I'd be open to it, if it seems like we always just need to add this.  I'm not enough an expert of unicode to understand the drawbacks, or why this was done as a plugin in the first place.  Is there a drawback, for example to having it core? I can see at the beginning having stuff like

Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

2013-03-04 Thread Luis E. Muñoz
On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:12 AM, John Napiorkowski wrote: Bill, I'd be open to it, if it seems like we always just need to add this. I'm not enough an expert of unicode to understand the drawbacks, or why this was done as a plugin in the first place. Is there a drawback, for example to

Re: [Catalyst] May be asynchronous communication between Catalyst applications

2013-03-04 Thread linuxsupport
Yes, I know that and tried with -f option, but result was same. On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Larry Leszczynski lar...@emailplus.orgwrote: Hi - On Sun, Mar 3, 2013, at 08:44 PM, linuxsupport wrote: I tried Catalyst::Plugin::RunAfterRequest, when I send request to the app, it returns

Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

2013-03-04 Thread John Napiorkowski
http://play-perl.org/quest/5134cdc18e0a96450f38 There was a discussion about this on #catalyst-dev and in general people seem to think its ok. Bill, are you up to giving the work a try?  I'd be happy to mentor you.  I don't think its killer work, but would really help John -

Re: [Catalyst] Tutorial (in VMware) keeps losing ability to authenticate

2013-03-04 Thread Tomas Doran
On 2 Mar 2013, at 14:54, Dan Lowe d...@tangledhelix.com wrote: Thanks for suggestions, everyone. This does seem to be what's happening (despite the fact that the VM is running ntpd). Even quite a while after un-sleeping the computer, the VM continues to have an incorrect date, so ntpd

Re: [Catalyst] May be asynchronous communication between Catalyst applications

2013-03-04 Thread Tomas Doran
On 4 Mar 2013, at 17:14, linuxsupport lin.supp...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I know that and tried with -f option, but result was same. No other ideas. Some code you haven't shown us doesn't work as you expect - we can't really do anything other than guess at this point :) Cheers t0m

Re: [Catalyst] ActionClass('RenderView') questions

2013-03-04 Thread Tomas Doran
On 4 Mar 2013, at 22:59, E R pc88m...@gmail.com wrote: In my root controller, I have this method: sub end : ActionClass('RenderView') { ... } I understand that this method is called after the controller for the request has finished and just before the view is called to render any

Re: [Catalyst] Backlog for proposed changes in next Catalyst release

2013-03-04 Thread Bill Moseley
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:24 AM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote: http://play-perl.org/quest/5134cdc18e0a96450f38 There was a discussion about this on #catalyst-dev and in general people seem to think its ok. Bill, are you up to giving the work a try? I'd be happy to mentor