Re: [Catalyst] does anybody know how to install catalyst over dreamhost shell account

2011-10-11 Thread Brian Cassidy
, -- Brian Cassidy (brian.cass...@gmail.com) ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http

Re: [Catalyst] Compress HTML

2011-09-08 Thread Brian Cassidy
://metacpan.org/module/HTML::Packer -- Brian Cassidy (brian.cass...@gmail.com) ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst

Re: [Catalyst] Base URI breakdown

2009-03-06 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Trevor Phillips trevor.phill...@gmail.com wrote: In a Catalyst app, I need to break down the base request URL to extract hostname, port, etc separately. Could you not use $c-req-uri [1]? -Brian [1]

Re: [Catalyst] Numerous Authorization queries

2008-11-13 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Stuart Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That means every iteration the check_user_roles() sub is being called to display the link and hence the db is being hit every time. First of all is this behavior supposed to happen? Yes, this is the intended behaviour. The

Re: [Catalyst] Numerous Authorization queries

2008-11-13 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Jason Kuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brian, is this really true? Using the DBIx::Class store? Things may have changed -- my work-around is quite dated now. It's worth an investigation. -Brian ___ List:

Re: [Catalyst] Model config not being loaded

2008-10-14 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:40 AM, dfx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This works fine on my local development machine, but doesn't work on the deployment server. The software versions are slightly older on the server (Catalyst 5.7006 on Perl 5.8.8, as opposed to Catalyst 5.7014 on Perl 5.10). I'm

Re: [Catalyst] Documentation for Catalyst::Model::DBIC

2008-08-21 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Terence Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could not find any documentation about how to supply a model's configuration parameters in the YAML in Catalyst::Model, since this is generic to all models. I finally found documentation in Catalyst::Model::Adaptor

Re: [Catalyst] ConfigLoader patch: pretty syntax for plugins

2008-08-04 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that ConfigLoader's pretty syntax¹ (particluarly with Config::General) for model, view and controller config didn't extend to plugin config. Here's a patch that extends the feature to cover plugins:

Re: [Catalyst] Checking out sources with svk?

2008-08-02 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Im trying to check out the Catalyst sources using svk on a Debian system. The wiki says that the sources are at http://dev.catalystframework.org/svnweb/Catalyst so i took the svk advice from the Advent

Re: [Catalyst] Configuring a Controller from the config file

2008-07-30 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Moritz Onken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- name: MyApp Controller::Root: key: value I had no luck. $c-config shows the hole config. I could access the config options via $c-config-{Controller::Root} but shouldn't it avaiable via $self-config? You should

[Catalyst] Re: [IMPORTANT] TEST Catalyst::Runtime 5.7100 RC1 (aka 5.7099_02)

2008-07-18 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Brian Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NB: It is IMPERATIVE that you TEST this release against YOUR code. Quoth mst: If you do not test now any bugs we ship with are your fault! -- so, there you have it :) Thanks to a number of testers, we've checked in a few

[Catalyst] [IMPORTANT] TEST Catalyst::Runtime 5.7100 RC1 (aka 5.7099_02)

2008-07-17 Thread Brian Cassidy
Hey All, We're putting out one final development release before we go full bore with 5.7100. NB: It is IMPERATIVE that you TEST this release against YOUR code. Quoth mst: If you do not test now any bugs we ship with are your fault! -- so, there you have it :) Also, we've reworked the authors

[Catalyst] Re: [IMPORTANT] TEST Catalyst::Runtime 5.7100 RC1 (aka 5.7099_02)

2008-07-17 Thread Brian Cassidy
As a quick follow-up, mst wanted me to mention some steps to go about installing the dev release and reverting said release should you want to go back to the latest stable version. 1) Download the release. This can be done a number of ways, including with wget: wget

Re: [Catalyst] [IMPORTANT] TEST Catalyst::Runtime 5.7100 RC1 (aka 5.7099_02)

2008-07-17 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:21 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tests a-ok on two fairly complex apps here, both use chained and the standard assortment of plugins (Auth, Session, Cache, Params::Nested). Also tests fine with View::TT,Mason,Email Catalyst::Controller::DBIC::API and

Re: [Catalyst] [IMPORTANT] TEST Catalyst::Runtime 5.7100 RC1 (aka 5.7099_02)

2008-07-17 Thread Brian Cassidy
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Brian Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope I'm not speaking out of turn, but, I believe... As it turns out: [21:15] mst bricas: incidentally, you're wrong about catamoose - 5.80 trunk is where it's staying [21:15] mst bricas: we'll cut 5.80 straight off

[Catalyst] [RFC] refactoring of component resolution methods + warnings

2008-05-30 Thread Brian Cassidy
Hey All, Further to my message from the 27th of May about component resolution, I have created a branch [1] to refactor how it works behind the scenes. Here is the excerpt from my updates to the Changes file: - Refactored component resolution (component(), models(), model(), et al). We now

Re: [Catalyst] Re: new catalyst version breaks test in Catalyst-Model-Adaptor-0.02 and Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-0.8

2008-05-23 Thread Brian Cassidy
John Goulah wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:35 PM, John Goulah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, I've narrowed down that the new version (5.7013) breaks tests in both of these modules, but I'm not sure why (they work against the last version of Catalyst 5.7012, so there has been some change

Re: [Catalyst] FYI: Contracting possibilities

2008-05-13 Thread Brian Cassidy
J. Shirley wrote: Brian, are you sure this is a legit gig? It seems moderately 419-esque in the vocabulary and some other things. Not sure at all. In the interest of full disclosure here is the private message i was sent (on vox) -- there isn't much private about it, so i'm sure he wont'

Re: [Catalyst] Hair-pulling over YAML config

2008-01-24 Thread Brian Cassidy
I'm not really sure why this thread was resurrected from almost a year ago... but... Carl Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've just spent an inordinate amount of time debugging a problem which was actually caused by my Yaml config file not parsing properly. Catalyst isn't helping much - all

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Utils::env_value ?

2008-01-09 Thread Brian Cassidy
Jesper Krogh wrote: Can anyone help me find out what my problem is here? $ perl -MDevel::SimpleTrace script/efam_server.pl Undefined subroutine Catalyst::Utils::env_value called What version of Catalyst do you have? The env_value sub only appears in 5.7008 and above.. -Brian

Re: [Catalyst] Problem with Catalyst::Plugin::I18N using UTF-8

2007-12-21 Thread Brian Cassidy
Knut-Olav Hoven wrote: There are some problems when translating with Catalyst::Plugin::I18N using special unicode characters like æøå. It got printed (both in console/debugging) and in web browser) as unprintable characters (displayed as ?). Manually changing encoding in Firefox to

Re: [Catalyst] Problem with Catalyst::Plugin::I18N using UTF-8

2007-12-21 Thread Brian Cassidy
Knut-Olav Hoven wrote: That seems like an odd solution... The Decode parameter is used to decode unicode characters, while the Unicode plugin is encoding to unicode...? This tutorial was never complete, and it's getting a little bit on the old side, but it's basically still valid: