Re: [Catalyst] Anybody who fancies some LWP poking ...
2008/5/15 John Goulah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Since these fix tests, will these modules get patched and released > with this applied? Thanks for the investigation Thomas, but I'd like to hold off until someone actually fixes the real problems and quietens the warnings using understanding. For now just downgrade LWP. Regards, Leon ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] Anybody who fancies some LWP poking ...
2008/5/10 Daniel McBrearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'd like Leon's opinion on this. Forwarding to him again. I understand many bits of it but have given up trying to get it working. I would love a patch which passes tests on both old and new lib-www-perls. Leon ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
