On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:12 AM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.com wrote:
People seem to get religious over how to version their API. I doubt I'd want
to take sides on this but here's how I think we could do both side (URL
version and content type versioning
Ya, I'm swayed by the
I've once again used up an hour or so reading Stack Overflow and blog posts
on REST API versioning. (And the arguments for and against.)
Perhaps extending the discussion on how Catalyst supports REST:
https://github.com/perl-catalyst/CatalystX-Proposals-REStandContentNegotiation
I'm wondering
, September 17, 2013 10:52 AM
Subject: [Catalyst] REST and versioning
I've once again used up an hour or so reading Stack Overflow and blog posts on
REST API versioning. (And the arguments for and against.)
Perhaps extending the discussion on how Catalyst supports REST:
https://github.com/perl
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:12 AM, John Napiorkowski jjn1...@yahoo.comwrote:
People seem to get religious over how to version their API. I doubt I'd
want to take sides on this but here's how I think we could do both side
(URL version and content type versioning
Ya, I'm swayed by the Accept:
