Hi there,
This is a frequently recurring conversation - so I created a wiki page
to gather all the points where we reached some consensus:
http://catwiki.toeat.com/crud. For the start I just dumped my
opinions. I tried to be not controversial - but it is a wiki - if you
don't agree then you can
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Mark Trostler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need 'create' 'update' 'delete' parts of your URL - those
should be denoted by the request type - POST, PUT, or DELETE right?
Yes - you are right about REST, but what something more than that. We
want to have
On 05/05/2008 02:33 PM, luke saunders wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Peter Karman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/05/2008 12:16 PM, J. Shirley wrote:
The discussions about a better CRUD base class with REST and RPC
adapters is obviously the better (best?) solution, but I
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:06:30AM -0700, J. Shirley wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry but I don't understand your point - so maybe first I'll restate
mine. If you have primary key in the database that is of type varchar
(or char
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:06:30AM -0700, J. Shirley wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry but I don't understand your point - so maybe first I'll restate
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Andrew Rodland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:50:08 am J. Shirley wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:06:30AM -0700, J. Shirley wrote:
I fail to see how whether the
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 6:19 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Andrew Rodland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:50:08 am J. Shirley wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 04, 2008
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:19 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Andrew Rodland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:50:08 am J. Shirley wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 04, 2008
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 07:50:08AM -0700, J. Shirley wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:06:30AM -0700, J. Shirley wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry but
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 6:19 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Andrew Rodland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:50:08 am J. Shirley wrote:
On Mon, May 5,
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 07:50:08AM -0700, J. Shirley wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:06:30AM -0700, J. Shirley wrote:
On Sun, May 4,
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM, luke saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:19 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Andrew Rodland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:50:08 am J. Shirley wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008
On 05/05/2008 12:16 PM, J. Shirley wrote:
The discussions about a better CRUD base class with REST and RPC
adapters is obviously the better (best?) solution, but I also think
there will be significant disagreement between appropriate URI
resource conventions (as my exchange with zby is an
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Peter Karman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/05/2008 12:16 PM, J. Shirley wrote:
The discussions about a better CRUD base class with REST and RPC
adapters is obviously the better (best?) solution, but I also think
there will be significant
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Peter Karman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/05/2008 12:16 PM, J. Shirley wrote:
The discussions about a better CRUD base class with REST and RPC
adapters is obviously the better (best?) solution, but I also think
there will be significant
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM, luke saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:19 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Andrew Rodland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:10 PM, luke saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM, luke saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:19 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/05/2008 03:29 PM, J. Shirley wrote:
My vote is hierarchy like:
/foo
/{token} # Can be pk1 if you so desire
/- # - is never acceptable as an identifier
/create # if you want an empty action here
Now, I do vote against having an explicit
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:29 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:10 PM, luke saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM, luke saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:38 AM, luke saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have started to write a Catalyst base controller for REST style CRUD
via DBIC. I have noticed that a number of other people have been
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 7:05 AM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a side note about REST - REST doesn't mean human readable URLs. It
means representative URLs. The bit about cd/id/{CDID}/ smells like
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* On Sat, May 03 2008, luke saunders wrote:
__PACKAGE__-config
( action = { setup = { PathPart = 'cd', Chained =
'/api/rest/rest_base' } },
class = 'RestTestDB::CD',
create_requires =
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry but I don't understand your point - so maybe first I'll restate
mine. If you have primary key in the database that is of type varchar
(or char or ...) then 'create' is a legitimage value for that primary
Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:54 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 7:05 AM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a side note about REST - REST doesn't mean
On May 4, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Christopher Laco wrote:
My pet peeve is that /foo/primary_key makes computers happy... but
not people.
/products/23
/products/ABC-1234
The first is the PK for a product record..
The second is the actual sku for a product... just a unique as the
pk...but
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 6:06 PM, J. Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry but I don't understand your point - so maybe first I'll restate
mine. If you have primary key in the database that is of type varchar
I have started to write a Catalyst base controller for REST style CRUD
via DBIC. I have noticed that a number of other people have been
working on or are thinking about working on something similar, most
notabley J. Shirley who seems to be creating
Catalyst::Controller::REST::DBIC::Item
27 matches
Mail list logo
