-Original Message-
From: Matt S Trout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 12:01 PM
To: The elegant MVC web framework
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Why use external FastCGI apps?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:47:01AM -0400, Matt Pitts wrote:
I'm honored by the invitation
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:47:01AM -0400, Matt Pitts wrote:
I'm honored by the invitation and I got my boss to OK it. So where
should it exist in the Wiki and what should it be called? PAR
Deployments w/ Apache and FastCGI?
Sounds good. To be entirely honest, I don't so much care where it goes
On 10 Mar 2008, at 14:47, Matt Pitts wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt S Trout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neat approach.
Thanks again for all the input.
Any chance you could repay in kind by writing up what you ended up
with
on the wiki?
Using PAR + external fcgi this way is
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:35:04AM -0500, Matt Pitts wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt S Trout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 1:18 PM
To: The elegant MVC web framework
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Why use external FastCGI apps?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:58:05AM -0500, Matt Pitts wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Pitts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The elegant MVC web framework
Subject: RE: [Catalyst] Why use external FastCGI apps
-Original Message-
From: Matt Pitts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The elegant MVC web framework
Subject: RE: [Catalyst] Why use external FastCGI apps?
Although I haven't had any experience yet with *external* fastcgi, I'm
I experienced similar behavior with Catalyst when using external FastCGI
controlled by init.d under two FC8 boxes.
When the app was restarted, it never came back. The processes were
still there, but the socket became non-responsive. Issuing another
start command would bring up another copy
testing/memory usage and can integrate it into my
vhost model without too much unhappiness.
v/r
-matt pitts
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:58 AM
To: The elegant MVC web framework
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Why use
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:46:36AM -0500, Matt Pitts wrote:
I just got advise from mst to not use mod_fcgid in production because it
doesn't support external fastcgi and this is the way to do HA apps. I
wanted to ask some questions and hear some arguments. I know there's
some existing traffic
Perhaps someone can help me with my problem and external FastCGI :-/
i have a fastcgi start/stop script (dont know anymore from which howto),
but i cant make fastcgi_server.sh restart
he say he stoped and started properly, but after that the socket is
broken?!?! i always need to stop, wait 5
]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 12:23 PM
To: The elegant MVC web framework
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Why use external FastCGI apps?
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:46:36 -0500, Matt Pitts wrote:
Why is it so much better to have fastcgi as an external process?
In my experience it has been
I just got advise from mst to not use mod_fcgid in production because it
doesn't support external fastcgi and this is the way to do HA apps. I
wanted to ask some questions and hear some arguments. I know there's
some existing traffic on the list about this, but I thought some fresh
info would be
Den Thursday 07 February 2008 19:05:48 skrev Matt Pitts:
Thanks for explanation, this makes a lot of sense to me.
Does anyone know if Apache's mpm_worker is compatible with mod_fastcgi and
external fastcgi? Is there any real benefit of threads in this scenario?
That's how I've installed it.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 13:05:48 -0500, Matt Pitts wrote:
Thanks for explanation, this makes a lot of sense to me.
Does anyone know if Apache's mpm_worker is compatible with mod_fastcgi and
external fastcgi? Is there any real benefit of threads in this scenario?
threaded mpm for apache is
14 matches
Mail list logo
