hi,
i have a slight problem designing software for one of business requirements.
this website will allow anonymous access. i.e. - when you go to
website, it will automatically create anonymous user so you will be
able to store all kind of information per this user without ever
logging in.
session
Hi,
I have a DBIC record object like
my $obj = $c-model(Database::Table)-find($id);
The table has very many fields and I would like to put their values in a TT
template without inserting them one by one in the stash.
So I would like to create a hash ref from $obj where the name of the field
On 13/03/07, Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a DBIC record object like
my $obj = $c-model(Database::Table)-find($id);
The table has very many fields and I would like to put their values in a TT
template without inserting them one by one in the stash.
So I would like to
It also served as an interesting exercise in getting a Cat site to run
under fastcgi on a host who don't really know how to support fastcgi,
using mod_rewrite to invoke the fastcgi server script.
Wife says That's very useful which is praise indeed.
Can you write up a short deployment
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
I have a DBIC record object like
my $obj = $c-model(Database::Table)-find($id);
The table has very many fields and I would like to put their values in a TT
template without inserting them one by one in the stash.
So I would like to create a hash
From: Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just put the object in the stash. TT abstracts the method/hash key
accessor issue for you so that [% obj.name1 %] will work whether obj is an
object with a name1 accessor or a hash with a name1 key.
Ok, then I will use that way. I hoped that the first
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
basically : an object IS a (blessed) hash.
Not necessarily, you can also bless scalars and arrays. A blessed array,
in particular can be a very effective way of improving performance for
certain types of data structures.
You kind of need to
Simon Wilcox wrote:
Not necessarily, you can also bless scalars and arrays. A blessed array,
in particular can be a very effective way of improving performance for
certain types of data structures.
Strictly speaking you can bless any reference, although the most useful
are hashes and
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just put the object in the stash. TT abstracts the method/hash key
accessor issue for you so that [% obj.name1 %] will work whether obj is an
object with a name1 accessor or a hash with a name1 key.
I know that an object is a blessed hash, but the DBIC objects are very
complex, and I cannot use
$c-stash($obj);
If I do that, the values from $obj hash reference are not put in the
template like when $obj is a reference to a common hash.
That's why I want to find how to put the key/values
On 3/13/07, Kiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Wilcox wrote:
Not necessarily, you can also bless scalars and arrays. A blessed array,
in particular can be a very effective way of improving performance for
certain types of data structures.
Strictly speaking you can bless any reference,
If I do that, the values from $obj hash reference are not put in the
template like when $obj is a reference to a common hash.
Impossible to know what you mean here without an example of the
template, but I commonly put DBIC objects on the stash, and call
methods on them with the dot operator
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
That's why I want to find how to put the key/values from $obj into a common
hash.
It sounds like this might be a bad design decision. Why would you not want
to group your template variables ?
As your app grows you'd be much more likely to see one
now. somebody else can use the same computer/browser to connect to his
account - named, with full login/password things.
so we create him a session (short term, only till the closing of browser).
but. after this named user will logout, or close the browser and
reopen - we should be able to go
From: Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will have to iterate over the accessors individually to put them into
the stash (I think) but you should be able to use DBIC to do most of the
thinking. Something like (untested):
my $model = $c-model(Database::Table);
foreach my $column
Daniel McBrearty wrote:
basically : an object IS a (blessed) hash.
http://perldoc.perl.org/perlboot.html
You kind of need to understand this, if you don't already. It's worth
having a read through the tutorials.
As others have pointed out, objects can also be created by blessing
other
On 3/13/07, Carl Johnstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't make sense to me, before the named user logs in they'll be
accessing the same anonymous session. Therefore you can't tell the
difference between the two different users.
anonymous is not 100% anonymous.
each anonymous session
Is it possible to do that without specifying all the keys by name? Or at
least is there a way to get all the keys from $obj, then loop and create a
hash, something like:
my $hash;
foreach(@keys) {
$hash-{$_} = $obj-$_;
}
You're asking for trouble with something like that. Create a DB column
anonymous is not 100% anonymous.
each anonymous session will have it's own user-id (without username
and possibility to login as this user) - this is to make sure one
doesn't have to register in order to use basic functionality of the
system (which needs to create some records in database).
It
From: Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will have to iterate over the accessors individually to put them into
the stash (I think) but you should be able to use DBIC to do most of the
thinking. Something like (untested):
my $model = $c-model(Database::Table);
foreach my $column
From: Daniel McBrearty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Impossible to know what you mean here without an example of the
template, but I commonly put DBIC objects on the stash, and call
methods on them with the dot operator in TT. TT is smart enough to
work out what needs to be done and do it
so whether the
Hi,
The problem appears when I want to use only [% element %] and not [%
obj.element %] in templates.
And I want to use the first way because there are very many variables and it
is more simple.
As others have said, I think this is going to bite you in the arse
later. K-I-S-S. It seems we
hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
but. after this named user will logout, or close the browser and
reopen - we should be able to go back to the previous anonymous
user.
When the registered user logs out, why must the application change back to
the previous anonymous session? Why can't it
On 3/13/07, Andrew Strader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the registered user logs out, why must the application change back to
the previous anonymous session? Why can't it generate a new anonymous
session? A user of a shared computer that doesn't register on your site
wouldn't expect their
On 3/13/07, Carl Johnstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have 20 people all use the same computer, and none of them login -
how many anonymous users do you have. How do you tell the difference between
them and switch between them?
no. if 20 people use the same computer - it's the same
I'm trying to use Chained('.') to create a controller base class that
binds to the namespace of whatever controller class inherits it, but
despite the documentation specifically mentioning this use, I can't
seem to get it to work.
I minimized the problem down to this simplest of
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 15:06, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
my $model = $c-model(Database::Table);
foreach my $column (@{$model-columns}) {
$column =~ s{me\.}{}; # strip the prefix DBIC adds
$c-stash-{$column} = $obj-$column;
}
I have tried that, but it gave the following error:
Jason Kohles wrote:
I'm trying to use Chained('.') to create a controller base class that
binds to the namespace of whatever controller class inherits it, but
despite the documentation specifically mentioning this use, I can't seem
to get it to work.
Where does the documentation say that? In
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Dave Howorth wrote:
In the context of the original question, it's also worth remembering
that an object is not the same as a hash as far as TT is concerned. It
unifies the syntax to call accessors and to access the members of a
hash. But it does *not* let you access
Bogdan Lucaciu wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 15:06, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
my $model = $c-model(Database::Table);
foreach my $column (@{$model-columns}) {
$column =~ s{me\.}{}; # strip the prefix DBIC adds
$c-stash-{$column} = $obj-$column;
}
I have tried that, but it gave
On Mar 13, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek wrote:
Jason Kohles wrote:
I'm trying to use Chained('.') to create a controller base class
that binds to the namespace of whatever controller class inherits
it, but despite the documentation specifically mentioning this
use, I can't
Following up from a mail way-back-when:
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Old [mailto:kevinold at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 8:37 PM
To: The elegant MVC web framework
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Mason configuration in YAML
I'm pretty sure you need to do it like this:
Jason Kohles wrote:
Apparently I misunderstood the relationship between Chained and
PathPart, and therefore misunderstood what the documentation was saying
here. So now the way I understand it is that Chained('.') means to
setup a chain segment that has as it's parent the chain segment that
From: Matt Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alternatively, get_columns will return a hash (not a reference!) of the
current row.
$c-stash-{obj }= { $row-get_columns };
Oh thanks. Finally I've used
$c-stash-{obj} = $obj;
and I've modified the template, because it seems that it is a better design.
Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek wrote:
You can chain your action only to other actions or to the root, not to
namespaces. The PathPart attribute controls how the path is built
visibly. There is a :PathPrefix implementation that does what you want
somewhere in Catalyst's SVN, but I don't know when it
On 3/13/07, Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please tell me what it means column inflation.
Check the docs for DBIx::Class::InflateColumn
--
Eden Cardim
Instituto Baiano de Biotecnologia
Núcleo de Biologia Computacional e Gestão de Informações Biotecnológicas
Laboratório de
There's a way you can mimic PathPrefix for now. This worked for me:
http://use.perl.org/~LTjake/journal/31738
Looking forward to the swarm of tweaks and fixes that are part of the next
Catalyst release :) --John
- Original Message
From: Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just wanted to get everyone's feedback on what they prefer as their
templating engine. I know there are a bunch of choices but wanted to see
what people think of certain ones. I am looking for something that
supports and promotes good practices and cutting edge techniques.
- Original Message
From: Mesdaq, Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The elegant MVC web framework catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 3:00:14 PM
Subject: [Catalyst] Template Engine
I just wanted to get everyone's feedback on what they prefer as their
templating engine. I know
you will find that most here use Template Toolkit, but i prefer
HTML::Mason, because i can do really interesting things with an OO-
based templating system. but embedding perl into HTML may not be
what you mean by promotes good practices .. mason is pretty
agnostic in that regard, but you
Hello
I chose TT for some reasons, including:
* The syntax is simple enough to have templates edited by web designers.
* It doesn't allow (unless you force it to) you to put Perl directly into the
template, thus making me (and my developers, especially ;-)) always prefer to
put the logic
I like the idea of OO based modules and systems. Is that the main
difference between TT and Mason? That is that Mason is OO based and TT
is not? That in itself could be a good enough reason to go with one over
the other. But support, documentation, and ease out weigh if its OO
based or not.
Does anyone know of a site(s) or book(s) that is a good resource for
perl web development? I have already done searches and have books but
some feedback from you guys would be great as well.
Its been sometime since I developed on the web and things have changed A
LOT! So I would like to get up to
Hi Hubert,
* hubert depesz lubaczewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-13 10:10]:
but. after this named user will logout, or close the browser
and reopen - we should be able to go back to the previous
anonymous user.
just to add a different voice: this approach seems perfectly
sensible to me. In
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 18:27, Mesdaq, Ali wrote:
Some of the areas I would specifically like to learn about are:
- table-less pages
- perl templating (already started a thread on that)
- Website security
- Ajax (basics, advanced, security)
- Advanced javascript
- Best practices (string
On 3/14/07, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only problem I see is that you may get a lot of spurious
sessions from registered users hitting the site before they head
to the login form. You should probably avoid creating sessions
until the user actually changes his settings or otherwise
46 matches
Mail list logo
