The catalyst docs could do with a substantial review, they haven't had much
attention lately. In particular there could do with being a good index.
I think the issue with people thinking catalyst is too big/complex is that
lots and lots of developers are used to a procedural approach to dealing
umm from something they're *more* familiar with.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Kieren Diment dim...@gmail.com wrote:
The catalyst docs could do with a substantial review, they haven't had
much attention lately. In particular there could do with being a good
index.
I think the issue with
I find that getting involved in a project like Catalyst is much like
releasing your own CPAN module - possibly daunting at first, hence some
reluctance?
From my own experience only, it took years to finally find something I
was comfortable to release, but when I did, it then starts to flow.
From: Kieren Diment
The catalyst docs could do with a substantial review, they haven't had much
attention lately. In particular there could do with being a good index.
I think the issue with people thinking catalyst is too big/complex is that
lots and lots of developers are used to a
Kieren Diment wrote on 1/3/2015 3:43 PM:
3. Catalyst used to be hard to install (and catalyst had a lot of
influence on improving the cpan toolchain during the relatively early
days), but this isn't the case any more, but the perception lingers in
places.
Catalyst isn't nearly as difficult
Is this something we can resolve, or simply make better as its install
process, that maybe needs explaining better?
On 03/01/15 22:26, Lance A. Brown wrote:
Kieren Diment wrote on 1/3/2015 3:43 PM:
3. Catalyst used to be hard to install (and catalyst had a lot of
influence on improving the
Robert Brown wrote on 1/3/2015 5:36 PM:
Is this something we can resolve, or simply make better as its install
process, that maybe needs explaining better?
I don't think it can be resolved unless Catalyst wants to move in the
same direction Mojolicious has taken, which I don't agree with.
I
