Re: [Catalyst] Change in $c-engine-prepare_parameters
On 3 Aug 2012, at 14:39, Bill Moseley wrote: What it doesn't do any more is set $c-req-parameters when called directly, only when called as a builder. I don't think prepare_parameters should be both a builder AND a method. What about this approach: +1, except I think the clearer should be _clear_parameters - we don't want to add a new public method for this if it can be avoided. Fancy making a 'proper' patch someone can apply which does these changes and updates the relevant doc? Cheers t0m ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] Change in $c-engine-prepare_parameters
I'll work on a patch and docs, yes. On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote: On 3 Aug 2012, at 14:39, Bill Moseley wrote: What it doesn't do any more is set $c-req-parameters when called directly, only when called as a builder. I don't think prepare_parameters should be both a builder AND a method. What about this approach: +1, except I think the clearer should be _clear_parameters - we don't want to add a new public method for this if it can be avoided. Fancy making a 'proper' patch someone can apply which does these changes and updates the relevant doc? Cheers t0m ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ -- Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] Change in $c-engine-prepare_parameters
See attached. Let me know if you want something else. I'm mixed on of the clear should be private. I made it that way, but I wonder if there could be a use case to reset the parameters so next time $c-req-parameters is called they get built again. I guess in that case why wouldn't they just call $c-prepare_parameters again? On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote: On 3 Aug 2012, at 14:39, Bill Moseley wrote: What it doesn't do any more is set $c-req-parameters when called directly, only when called as a builder. I don't think prepare_parameters should be both a builder AND a method. What about this approach: +1, except I think the clearer should be _clear_parameters - we don't want to add a new public method for this if it can be avoided. Fancy making a 'proper' patch someone can apply which does these changes and updates the relevant doc? Cheers t0m ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ -- Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org prepare_parameters.diff Description: Binary data live_engine_request_prepare_parameters.t Description: Troff document ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
