On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 05:00:48 -0500
Mike Frysinger vapier@gmail.com wrote:
make the default a ./configure option that defaults to off
I would prefer not to make a build-time option of this, because then the
documentation has say something in line with whether files are compressed by
default
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 16:00, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 05:00:48 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
make the default a ./configure option that defaults to off
I would prefer not to make a build-time option of this, because then the
documentation has say something in line with whether
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:39:47 +
Dalton, Tom tdal...@hp.com wrote:
I would say for the first release of a new feature, default it to off. That
gives people a chance to 'play' with it without potentially breaking existing
installations that are simply upgrading. If there are no major problems
4 mar 2010 kl. 22.30 skrev Joel Rosdahl:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:39:47 +
Dalton, Tom tdal...@hp.com wrote:
I would say for the first release of a new feature, default it to off. That
gives people a chance to 'play' with it without potentially breaking existing
installations that are
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 17:10, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
Lars Gustäbel's compression patch (which will be incorporated in ccache 3.0)
enables compression by default, and if you don't want compression you have to
set CCACHE_NOCOMPRESS. I'm still a bit undecided about whether defaulting to
compression
in the next release
after that (e.g. ccache-3.1).
-Original Message-
From: ccache-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:ccache-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Joel Rosdahl
Sent: 02 March 2010 22:11
To: ccache@lists.samba.org
Subject: [ccache] Compression on or off by default?
Hi,
Lars
Hi,
Lars Gustäbel's compression patch (which will be incorporated in ccache 3.0)
enables compression by default, and if you don't want compression you have to
set CCACHE_NOCOMPRESS. I'm still a bit undecided about whether defaulting to
compression is a good idea, though. Maybe we should be more