OK. I'm working on a patch to support - isystemfoo
On Sep 5, 2015 13:40, "Joel Rosdahl" wrote:
> Robert Houghton wrote:
> > Is looks like ccache v3.2.1 will not use the CCACHE_BASEDIR option when
> > considering paths provided by -isystem. Is this intentional, an
> oversight,
> > or a bug?
>
>
Robert Houghton wrote:
> Is looks like ccache v3.2.1 will not use the CCACHE_BASEDIR option when
> considering paths provided by -isystem. Is this intentional, an oversight,
> or a bug?
ccache does recognize -isystem, but only when used like "-isystem foo", not
in the form "-isystemfoo" (it's news
On 03/09/15 23:03, Robert Houghton wrote:
Is looks like ccache v3.2.1 will not use the CCACHE_BASEDIR option when
considering paths provided by -isystem. Is this intentional, an oversight,
or a bug?
I'd say it's not intentional. -I and -isystem differ only in the search
order, which shouldn't
My companies build system uses -isystem for including 3rd party libraries
like python, Qt4 and others. Unfortunately, the paths from -isystem are
soft-linked to be relative to the personal build area instead of being
directly referenced.
Is looks like ccache v3.2.1 will not use the CCACHE_BASEDIR